Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ossi v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 103 A.D.2d 771 (2d Dep't 1984) 19 Solomon v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439 (1st Dep't 1989) 19 Statutes 14 V.I.C. § 1722(b) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(d) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(e) Correction Law § 168-a(2) Correction Law § 168-a(2)(a) 7 7 7 9 5, 9 Correction Law § 168-
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ossi v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 103 A.D.2d 771 (2d Dep't 1984) 19 Solomon v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439 (1st Dep't 1989) 19 Statutes 14 V.I.C. § 1722(b) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(d) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(e) Correction Law § 168-a(2) Correction Law § 168-a(2)(a) 7 7 7 9 5, 9 Correction Law § 168-
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
) 27 Rossi v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 103 A.D.2d 771 (2d Dep't 1984) Solomon v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439 (let Dep't 1989) Statutes 14 V.I.C. § 1722(b) 19 19 14 V.I.C. § 1724(d) 7 14 V.I.C. § 1724(e) 7 Correction Law § 168-a(2) 9 Correction Law § 168-a(2)(a) 5, 9 Correction Law §
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ossi v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 103 A.D.2d 771 (2d Dep't 1984) 19 Solomon v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439 (1st Dep't 1989) 19 Statutes 14 V.I.C. § 1722(b) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(d) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(e) Correction Law § 168-a(2) Correction Law § 168-a(2)(a) 7 7 7 9 5, 9 Correction Law § 168-
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (140)
Entities connected to both V.I.C. and the Facts Cited Therein
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION57 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON52 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
Sarah Ferguson
PERSON25 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
New York
LOCATION24 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON20 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
the State of New York
LOCATION12 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON9 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON8 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON8 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
Legislature
ORGANIZATION7 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
Bill Richardson
PERSON7 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
New York City
LOCATION6 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services
ORGANIZATION6 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON6 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION6 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
ORGANIZATION7 w/ V.I.C.·3 w/ the
Adriana Ross
PERSON6 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
Appellant
ORGANIZATION5 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
Gilbert
PERSON5 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the
New York District
LOCATION5 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ the