Epstein Secrets

Chief when he learned that they were handling or involved in supervising the federal investigation of Epstein. In December, former SDFL AUSA Lilly Ann Sanchez and court also contacted AUSA to set a meeting. In advance of that meeting, AUSA requested documents but that request was refused. Ms. Sanchez t

On or about July 15, 2004, DefendantIMEMS placed one or niorii telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #9. (67) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendan caused Jane Doe #9 to make one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #10. (68) On or about July 17, 2004, Defendant telephone c

onable modifications and accommodations which ultimately resulted in United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta's' December 19, 2007 letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez. In that letter, the United States Attorney tried to eliminate all concerns which, quite frankly, the SDFL was not obligated to address, let alone

lephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #15. (147) On or about April 1, 2005, one of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's employees prepared a note for Defendan FFREY EPSTEIN's review that read: "10:30 [Jane Doe #15]/[Jane Doe #10] on Fri around 2'Oclock". (148) In or around June 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EP

pes were gone. Nonetheless, the search did recover some evidence of value, 'During a meeting, Epstein's current attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, admitted that attorney Roy Black instructed Epstein to have the CPUs removed, but they insisted that those instructions were given well in advance

he masturbated. 8 EFTA02857682 (5) In or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of $300 to Jane Doe #2. (6) In or around 2001, Defendan placed a telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #2 to make an appointment for Jane Doe #2 to travel to 358 El Brillo Way. (7) In or arou