Epstein Secrets

ivity would not be granted until government consulted with victim); United States v. Ingrassia, No. CR-04-0455ADSJO, 2005 WL 2875220, at *17 n. 11 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2005) (Senate debate supports the view that the contemplated mechanism for victims to obtain information on which to base their input was

or C.D.Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1016 (9th Cir. 2006) Mlle statute was enacted to make crime victims full participants in the criminal justice system"); Heaton 458 F. Supp. 2d at 1273 (the right to confer is "not limited to particular proceedings" but is "expansive" and applies broadly to "any critical stage or disposi

ivity would not be granted until government consulted with victim); United States v. Ingrassia, No. CR-04-0455ADSJO, 2005 WL 2875220, at *17 n. 11 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2005) (Senate debate supports the view that the contemplated mechanism for victims to obtain information on which to base their input was

or C.D.Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1016 (9th Cir. 2006) Mlle statute was enacted to make crime victims full participants in the criminal justice system"); Heaton 458 F. Supp. 2d at 1273 (the right to confer is "not limited to particular proceedings" but is "expansive" and applies broadly to "any critical stage or disposi

ivity would not be granted until government consulted with victim); United States v. Ingrassia, No. CR-04-0455ADSJO, 2005 WL 2875220, at *17 n. 11 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2005) (Senate debate supports the view that the contemplated mechanism for victims to obtain information on which to base their input was

or C.D.Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1016 (9th Cir. 2006) Mlle statute was enacted to make crime victims full participants in the criminal justice system"); Heaton 458 F. Supp. 2d at 1273 (the right to confer is "not limited to particular proceedings" but is "expansive" and applies broadly to "any critical stage or disposi

ivity would not be granted until government consulted with victim); United States v. Ingrassia, No. CR-04-0455ADSJO, 2005 WL 2875220, at *17 n. 11 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2005) (Senate debate supports the view that the contemplated mechanism for victims to obtain information on which to base their input was

or C.D.Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1016 (9th Cir. 2006) Mlle statute was enacted to make crime victims full participants in the criminal justice system"); Heaton 458 F. Supp. 2d at 1273 (the right to confer is "not limited to particular proceedings" but is "expansive" and applies broadly to "any critical stage or disposi

ivity would not be granted until government consulted with victim); United States v. Ingrassia, No. CR-04-0455ADSJO, 2005 WL 2875220, at *17 n. 11 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2005) (Senate debate supports the view that the contemplated mechanism for victims to obtain information on which to base their input was

or C.D.Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1016 (9th Cir. 2006) Mlle statute was enacted to make crime victims full participants in the criminal justice system"); Heaton 458 F. Supp. 2d at 1273 (the right to confer is "not limited to particular proceedings" but is "expansive" and applies broadly to "any critical stage or disposi