Epstein Secrets

dant, and for which Defendant expressly agreed to pay pursuant to a Non-Prosecution Agreement that he entered into with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. Plaintiff further alleges: ALLEGATIONS PERTAINING TO ALL COUNTS Jurisdiction I. Plaintiff, Podhurst Orseck, P.A. ("Podhurst firm" or

bject of the joint invatigr.lon by die Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Office, nor any offenses that arose from the Federal Grand hay investigation will be instituted in this District, end the charges against Epstein if any, will be dismissed. Page 2 of 7 EFTA00727910 Case

dant, and for which Defendant expressly agreed to pay pursuant to a Non-Prosecution Agreement that he entered into with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. Plaintiff further alleges: ALLEGATIONS PERTAINING TO ALL COUNTS Jurisdiction I. Plaintiff, Podhurst Orseck, P.A. ("Podhurst firm" or

bject of the joint invatigr.lon by die Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Office, nor any offenses that arose from the Federal Grand hay investigation will be instituted in this District, end the charges against Epstein if any, will be dismissed. Page 2 of 7 EFTA00207417 Case

DINGS OF PETITIONERS THIS CAUSE is before the court on the petitioners' motion to use correspondence generated between the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO/SDFL) and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein to prove the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) violations alleged in this proceeding, joined

ry" as authority for its submission of the above documents under seal. The November 8, 2011 order refers to certain collateral evidence gathered in Federal Grand Jury Proceeding 05-02 and Federal Grand Jury Proceeding 07-103 (WPB) [DE 121-1, page 15], matters having little, if any, relevance to the issues fr