Epstein Secrets

present that interest. Among the interests that satisfy these criteria are injury to reputation. Sackniani. Liggett Grp., Inc., 167 F.R.D. 6, 20-21 (E.D.N.Y. 1996) (citing Penthouse Intl. W.I. Playboy Enterprises, Inc.. 663 F.2d 371, 373, 392 (2d Cir. 1981)). The burden of demonstrating an interest relat

ptember 3, 2008 VIA COURIER Re: Jeffrey Epstein/ NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM Dear By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida provides you with the following notice because you are an identified victim of a federal offense. On June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (he

such intervention is reviewed only for abuse of discretion. Stone'. First Union Corp.. 371 F.3d 1305, 1309 (1Ith Cir. 2004); see also AT&T Corp. '. Sprint Corp., 407 F.3d 560, 561-62 (2nd Cir. 2005) ("[a] denial of permissive intervention has virtually never been reversed" because of the considerable discret

ranceX.com, Inc., No. 06-cv-2225, 2010 WL 11606632, at *4 14 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00000888 EFTA 00114972 EFTA01263259 To Be Filed Under Seal (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2010) (order was not improvidently granted where "parties were concerned about exchanging commercially sensitive material with their direct

Protective Order. Permissive intervention is the appropriate procedural device when any non-party seeks to modify a protective order. AT&T Corp. v. Sprint Corp., 407 F.3d 560, 562 (2d Cir. 2005) ("We have stated that permissive intervention is the proper method for a nonparty to seek a modification of a pro

al a earance is not required if the requested documents are: (I) produced on or before the return date date etad~tto Parale al , U.S. Attorne 's Office for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY 10007, and (2) accompanied by an executed copy of the attached Declaration of Custodian of Records. Failure to attend and produc

rney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorney New York, New York 10007 EFTA00172176 RIDER Grand Jury Subpoena to Sprint Corp. dated April 23, 2020 Reference # 2019R01446 In accordance with the precedin sub oena, please provide the following information related to the tele

HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den r 2 Tel. A

cument 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page4 of 74 Table of Authorities Cases Application of Newsday, Inc., 895 F.2d 74 (2d Cir. 1990) 40 AT&T Corp. v. Sprint Corp., 407 F.3d 560 (2d Cir. 2005) 26 Bernstein v. Bernstein Li towitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, 814 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 2016) 17 Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F

FragranceNetcom, Inc. v. Fragrancel.com, Inc., No. 06-cv-2225, 2010 WL 11606632, at •4 14 SDNY_GM_00000888 EFTA00086699 To Be Filed Under Seal (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2010) (order was not improvidently granted where "parties were concerned about exchanging commercially sensitive material with their direct

Protective Order. Permissive intervention is the appropriate procedural device when any non-party seeks to modify a protective order. AT&T Corp. v. Sprint Corp., 407 F.3d 560, 562 (2d Cir. 2005) ("We have stated that permissive intervention is the proper method for a nonparty to seek a modification of a pro