Epstein Secrets

he parties were present and represented by counsel. Based upor) argument, it is . ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that 1. The Motion to Stay is denied. 2. The Clerk of Court shall make the documents available for disclosure at noon on Thursday, July 2, 2009. It is the intent of the Court to give the Defendant, Mr. Epste

9 So.2d 389, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) custody proceeding are not considered as "necessary parties" to the action. See Shienvold v. Habit:, 622 So.2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). There- fore, it is manifestly obvious that the minor chil- dren in this case are not "parties" to this

the parties were present and represented by counsel. Based upori argument, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that 1. The Motion to Stay is denied. 2. The Clerk of Court shall make the documents available for disclosure at noon on Thursday, July 2, 2009. It Is the intent of the Court to give the Defendant, Mr. Epste

9 769 .2d 389d4 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 M.2d 389) custody proceeding are not considered as "necessary arties" to the action. See Shienvold v. liable, 622 e2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). There- fore, it is manifestly obvious that the minor chil- dren in this case are not "parties" to this p

s the parties were present and represented by counsel. Based upon argument, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that 1. The Motion to Stay is denied. 2. The Clerk of Court shall make the documents available for disclosure at noon on Thursday, July 2, 2009. It is the intent of the Court to give the Defendant, Mr. Epste

9 So.2d 389, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) custody proceeding are not considered as "necessary parties" to the action. See Shienvold v. liable. 622 So.2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). There- fore, it is manifestly obvious that the minor chil- dren in this case are not "parties" to this