Epstein Secrets

(S.D. Fla. 2009). Doe No. 102 v Epstein, Case No. 09-80656 (S.D. Fla. 2009); Doe No. 8 v. Epstein, Case No. 09-80802 (S.D. Fla. 2009). 2 Em In re: Jane Doe, Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008). 0911212019 3 Pa CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331875 EFTA_0020460 EFTA02729586

ent, Judge Pucillo found, was "a significant inducement in accepting this plea." Such agreements and related documents typically are public record. See Oregonian Publishing Co. v United States District come 920 F.2d 1462, 1465 (9th Cir. 1990) ("plea agreements have typically been open to the public"); United States v el y

d on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 Page 5 of 11 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Background Defendant Epstein has filed a boilerplate motion to strike Jane Doe's trial date — and numerous other consolidated cases involving similar allegations of his sexual abuse of minors - for an unspecified period of time,

ent, Judge Pucillo found, was "a significant inducement in accepting this plea." Such agreements and related documents typically are public record. See Oregonian Publishing Co. v. United States District Court, 920 17.2d 1462, 1465 (9th Cir. 1990) ("plea agreements have typically been open to the public"); United States v.

public disclosure of the victims' identities in these cases, and allowed the Plaintiff in that case to "proceed in this action under the pseudonym 'Jane Doe' ", by Order dated October 6, 2008. 7. Jeffrey Epstein sets forth no facts to support his bare contention that Jane Does 2- 7 use of a pseudonym in

ent, Judge Pucillo found, was "a significant inducement in accepting this plea." Such agreements and related documents typically are public record. See Oregonian Publishing Co. v. United States District Court, 920 17.2d 1462, 1465 (9th Cir. 1990) ("plea agreements have typically been open to the public"); United States v.