Epstein Secrets

a telephone used by Jane Doe #2 to make an appointment for Jane Doe #2 to travel to (6) In or around 2002, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid $400 to Jane Doe #2, who was then fifteen years' old, to (7) In or around 2002, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN asked.Jane Doe #2 if she had any younger friends who woul

ON IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIF TELY AT: To: Company: Fax X: Direct It: e of thc Deputy Attorney Ge -Honvreible Mark Filip Offic Unite ate d St s Depanment ofJ usrieeneral From: Date: Pegesmicoyen Fax It: Direct X: Kenneth W. Starr May 19, 2008 . 9 Message' EFTA01718499 UO/UC/VO ~fl 44:Dd u4

KAM Document 79-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2011 Page 2 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-Civ- JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. BRUCE E. REINHART, Intervenor INTERVENOR'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Comes

. The employee participates in a Board meeting to discuss what position the association should take concerning the award of a recent contract by the Depanment of Energy (DOE). When a former DOE employee addresses the Board to argue that the association should object to the award of the contract, she is di

FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 1 of 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO JANE DOE NI AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF TH

. The employee participates in a Board meeting to discuss what position the association should take concerning the award of a recent contract by the Depanment of Energy (DOE). When a former DOE employee addresses the Board to argue that the association should object to the award of the contract, she is di