Epstein Secrets

nt 38 Entered on FLSD Docket Page 3 of 13 "agreed to defer federal prosecution in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida . . .." See In re. Jane Doe, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-Marra/Johnson (S.D. Fla.) (DE 14), Decl. of AUSA ;07/09/08, ¶ 5, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (emphasis added). Under the A

may be entitled to discovery of relevant evidence that is in the present possession of the grand jury or other law-enforcement agencies. See, e.g., Simpson v. Hines, 729 F. Supp. 526, 527 (E.D. Tex. 1989) ("The grand jury has concluded its deliberations . . The need for secrecy of these specific tapes no longer

ered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 3 of 13 "agreed to defer federal prosecution in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida . ... See In re. Jane Doe, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-Marrahlohn.son (S.D. Fla.) (DE 14), 07/09/08, 1 5, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (emphasis added). Under the Agreement, the

may be entitled to discovery of relevant evidence that is in the present possession of the grand jury or other law-enforcement agencies. See, e.g., Simpson v. Hines, 729 F. Supp. 526, 527 (E.D. Tex. 1989) ("The grand jury has concluded its deliberations ... . The need for secrecy of these specific tapes no longe

red on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 3 of 13 "agreed to defer federal prosecution in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida . . .." See In re. Jane Doe, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-Marra/Johnson (S.D. Fla.) (DE 14), 07/09/08, 1 5, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (emphasis added). Under the Agreement, the

may be entitled to discovery of relevant evidence that is in the present possession of the grand jury or other law-enforcement agencies. See, e.g., Simpson v. Hines, 729 F. Supp. 526, 527 (E.D. Tex. 1989) ("The grand jury has concluded its deliberations ... . The need for secrecy of these specific tapes no longe

tted willful acts of child sexual abuse on Jane Doe. These acts resulted in mental or sexual injury to Jane Doe, that caused or were likely to cause Jane Doe's mental or emotional health to be significantly impaired. 26. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Jane Doe. Epstein knew or had

may be entitled to discovery of relevant evidence that is in the present possession of the grand jury or other law-enforcement agencies. See, e.g., Simpson v. Hines, 729 F. Supp. 526, 527 (E.D. Tex. 1989) ("The grand jury has concluded its deliberations ... . The need for secrecy of these specific tapes no longe

ction. Introduction This lawsuit arises from a pending federal criminal action concerning, among other things, an alleged assault of the plaintiff Jane Doe, who, according to her complaint, on "numerous occasions" provided "massages" to Epstein with "no credentials to provide massage therapy" and was "

may be entitled to discovery of relevant evidence that is in the present possession of the grand jury or other law- enforcement agencies. See, e.g., Simpson v. Hines, 729 F. Supp. 526, 527 (E.D. Tex. 1989) ("The grand jury has concluded its deliberations . . . . The need for secrecy of these specific tapes no lo

red on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 3 of 13 "agreed to defer federal prosecution in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida . . .." See In re. Jane Doe, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-Marra/Johnson (S.D. Fla.) (DE 14), Decl. of AUSA Villafana, 07/09/08, 1 5, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (emphasis added). U

may be entitled to discovery of relevant evidence that is in the present possession of the grand jury or other law-enforcement agencies. See, e.g., Simpson v. Hines, 729 F. Supp. 526, 527 (E.D. Tex. 1989) ("The grand jury has concluded its deliberations ... . The need for secrecy of these specific tapes no longe