Epstein Secrets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. GOVERNMENT'S STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMEN

's exercise of his prosecutorial discretion with the Assistant Attorney General and with the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), within the Criminal Division of the DOJ 6 EFTA00211712 in Washington, D.C. Exs. G, K, L. From late 2007 to May 2008, Epstein's attorneys attempted to convince senior attorney at CEOS t

During the course of the federal criminal investigation Epstein, Jane Doe No. 2 was represented by attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., whose services were paid for by Epstein. Ex. S, 9 7. Through her attorney, Jane Doe No.

ein challenged the United States Attorney's exercise of his prosecutorial discretion at the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), within the Criminal Division of the DOJ in Washington, D.C. Ex. G. From January to May 2008, Epstein's attorneys submitted lengthy documents to CEOS attempting to convince senior attorney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. GOVERNMENT'S STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMEN

's exercise of his prosecutorial discretion with the Assistant Attorney General and with the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), within the Criminal Division of the DOJ in Washington, D.C. Exs. G, K, L. From late 2007 to May 2008, Epstein's attorneys attempted 6 EFTA00211765 to convince senior attorney at CEOS t

tered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. GOVERNMENT'S STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMEN

's exercise of his prosecutorial discretion with the Assistant Attorney General and with the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), within the Criminal Division of the DOJ 6 EFTA00799600 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 402 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 7 of 10 in Washington, D.C. Exs. G, K, L. From late 20