Epstein Secrets

Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 57 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS AND MOTI

m letter to Jane Doe 5 also acknowledged the victims' rights under the CVRA at the same time as the Office was not disclosing the NPA's existence to Jane Doe 5 and the other victiim."6 101. In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted the line AUSA handling the case to inform her that he represented Jane Doe 1 a

Florida matter Suppl. Box 3 P-013947 E-mail, to May 3, 2011, for atty work product; law enforcement investigatiory record 12:23 p.m., RE: OPR Inquiry — request information, with post-it note attached with handwritten attorney notes on tele 'hone call between and with and Suppl. Box 3 P-0139

A-authorized release; Material Severable; Redaction; No Assertion by Victims Box #2 P-008809 Thru P-008847 File folder entitled "[Victim namej/Jane Doe #6" containing meta-analysis of all phone, travel, and grand jury data related to that victim/witness for indictment preparation Work product

secutor; Attorney Conduct at Issue; Final Decision; Waiver Suppl. Box 3 P-013947 E-mail, Paul Cassell to Plagenhoef, May 3, 2011,12:23 p.m., RE: OPR Inquiry — request for information, with post-it note attached with handwritten attorney notes on telephone call between Plagenhoef and Howard with Dexter

ict of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman Paul G. Cassell S.J. I uinne olle e of Law at the Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 2 EFTA00209307 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 216-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2013 Page 1 of 14 SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE

cord, atty work product; deliberative process privilege Suppl. Box 3 P-013947 E-mail, Paul Cassell to Plagenhoef, May 3, 2011, 12:23 p.m., RE: OPR Inquiry — request for information, with post-it note attached with handwritten attorney notes on telephone call between Plagenhoef and Howard with Dexter

3268 Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake Cit Utah 84112 Fax: E-mail: Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 2 EFTA00223851 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 216-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2013 Page 1 of 14 SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE

aul 12:23 p.m., information, handwritten between and Cassell to May 3, 2011, atty work product; law enforcement investigatiory record RE: OPR Inquiry — request for with post-it note attached with attorney notes on telephone call and Howard with Suppl. Box 3 P-013948 Thru P-013951 E-mail, t

e informed the USAO and the FBI that she was not a victim of any offense committed by Epstein, and, as a result, the USAO did not consider informing Jane Doe #2 about the non-prosecution agreement. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. 2(e). 3. Denied. 4. Denied. 5. The

cord, atty work product; deliberative process privilege Suppl. Box 3 P-013947 E-mail, Paul Cassell to Plagenhoef, May 3, 2011, 12:23 p.m., RE: OPR Inquiry — request for infonnation, with post-it note attached with handwritten attorney notes on telephone call between Plagenhoef and Howard with Dexter

FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S NOTICE OF FILING OF OBJECTIONS TO PRIVLEGE LOG COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also refe

secutor; Attorney Conduct at Issue; Final Decision; Waiver Suppl. Box 3 P-013947 E-mail, Paul Cassell to Plagenhoef, May 3, 2011,12:23 pan., RE: OPR Inquiry — request for information, with post-it note attached with handwritten attorney notes on telephone call between Plagenhoef and Howard with Dexter