Epstein Secrets

eral Bureau of Investigation In Reply, Please Refer to Pile No. Seth Lehrman, Esquire Rothstein Rosenfeldt, Adler Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Re: Jane Doe v. Jeffre Case No: 08-8089 Dear Mr. Lehrman: stein IN/ 16320 N.W. 2nd Avenue North Miami Beach, Florida 33169 October 20, 2009 We are in rece

sions. The procedure is mandatory and governs state and federal proceedings and has been upheld in the United States Supreme Court. See U.S. ex rel, Touhv v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). To obtain FBI investigative information, the party making the request must provide to this office an affidavit, or s

rd Epstein between approximately 2006 and 2007. The statements we seek are those given to the FBI by our clients, each of whom has brought suit as a Jane Doe in the Southern District of Florida. The statements given to the FBI investigators are directly relevant because the FBI investigation concerned the

sions. The procedure is mandatory and governs state and federal proceedings and has been upheld in the United States Supreme Coutt, See U.S. a rel, Touhv, v. Ram 340 U.S. 462 (1951). In addition, the Privacy Act (Title 5, U.S.C., Section 552O), prohibits the release of agency records pertaining to an

Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) < (USANYS) (USANYS) < Cc: >; <->; Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests I take it we fully know that Jane Doe is Maria Lacerda? I had a little pause on handing out the GJ subpoena, but since it's something previously disclosed to her, I can't see much of a

tein-Related Touhy Requests (USANYS) ; <->; I have some hesitation on just referring them to NDGa for the SDFla investigative stuff. First, under Touhv section 16.22(b), the responsible USA is the USA for the district "where the issuing authority" is located. They actually have an action filed in t