8
Shared Docs
8
Same-Page
8 / 8
Mentions
tner in the former firm of Herman, & Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled "Jane Doe # vs. Jeffrey Epstein," despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder
sked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from M. to J. Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug
U.S. Attorney's Office. Mr. Edwards first saw a reference to the NPA on or after July 9, 2008, when the Government filed its responsive pleading to Jane Doe's emergency petition. Thet—pleading—was—the—ficst—publie mention of the non prosecution agreement and the first disclosure to Mr. Edwards (and thus to
tifieatien-Letter, You-wfite-that-you-denit-understand-the-basis-fer-the-Offieels-belief--that-it-is appropriate to notify the victims. Pursuant to the "Justice for All Act of 2001," fanother-name-frent-the-GV-11.41-mime-ktimims-are-entitled-te e-right-to masenabler aeeurater and-timely-netiee-of-any-publie-emmt-pmee
partner in the former firm of Herman, Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for S50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled "Jane Doc # vs. Jeffrey Epstein," despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder
xed that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from M. So J. Lelkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug
er in the former firm of Herman, , & Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled "Jane Doe # vs. Jeffrey Epstein," despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder
sked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from M. to J. Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug
partner in the former firm of Herman, Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled "Jane Doe # vs. Jeffrey Epstein," despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder
asked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from to J. Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug
the formcr firm of Herman, Sloman, & Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled "Jane Doe # vs. 'effigy Epstein" despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Federa
asked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from M. o . Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug
9. who is the named partner in the former firm of filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled "Jane Doe # vs. Jeffrey Epstein," despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder
asked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from to J. Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug
39. who is the named partner in the former firm of filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each awsut is entitled "Jane Doe # vs. Jeffrey Epstein," despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder
asked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from.. to J. Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug
Entities connected to both Jane Doe and the "Justice for All Act

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONthe Southern District
LOCATIONMaria Farmer
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONRoy Black
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Jeffrey Sloman
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Ken Starr
PERSONthe Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION
Julie K. Brown
PERSONGerald Lefcourt
PERSON