Epstein Secrets

im for damages. whether pursuant to state. federal or common law". Exhibit 2, NPA 1 8. More is required of a plaintiff than to simply allege, as did Jane Doc 101, that she "exclusively seeks civil remedies pursuant to 18 USC 2255." Exhibit 27, Amended Complaint 1 24. Such an averment satisfies only the e

Epstein committed willful acts of child sexual abuse on Jane Doe. These acts resulted in mental or sexual injury that caused or were likely to cause Jane Doe's mental or emotional health to be significantly impaired. 25. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Janc Doe. Epstein knew or had

were likely to cause Jane Doe's mental or emotional health to be significantly impaired. 25. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Janc Doe. Epstein knew or had reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional distress and damage to Jane Doe, or Epstein a

Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs 5 Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. 6 THE COURT: Good morning. 7 MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane 8 Doe. 9 THE COURT: Good morning. 10 MR. GARCIA: Good morning, Your Honor. Sid Garcia for 11 Jane Doe II. 12 THE COURT: Good morning. 13 MR. WILLI

previously acknowledged that the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See Exhibit 24, July 3, 2008 Email from Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafana to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the (work release] program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated priso

im for damages, whether pursuant to state. federal, or common law". Exhibit 2, NPA 18. More is required of a plaintiff than to simply allege, as did Jane Doe 101, that she "exclusively seeks civil remedies pursuant to 18 USC 2255." Exhibit 27, Amended Complaint 1 24. Such an averment satisfies only the exc

s, while Jane Doe I1 already bad a pending state court suit filed in July of 2008 seeking damages against Epstein for sexual assault and conspiracy. Jane Doe H in her federal complaint alleged Epstein could "not contest liability for claims brought exclusively pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255". Exhibit 27, Amend

h you had previously acknowledged that the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See Exhibit 24, July 3, 2008 Email from Assistant U.S. Attorney to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the [work release] program, we ve no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated prisone

im for damages, whether pursuant to state. federal, or common law". Exhibit 2, NPA 18. More is required of a plaintiff than to simply allege, as did Jane Doe 101, that she "exclusively seeks civil remedies pursuant to 18 USC 2255." Exhibit 27, Amended Complaint 1 24. Such an averment satisfies only the exc

s, while Jane Doe I1 already bad a pending state court suit filed in July of 2008 seeking damages against Epstein for sexual assault and conspiracy. Jane Doe H in her federal complaint alleged Epstein could "not contest liability for claims brought exclusively pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255". Exhibit 27, Amend

previously acknowledged that the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See Exhibit 24, July 3, 2008 Email from Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafana to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the [work release] program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated priso

ommon law claims SEE NPA of the right to bring contested litigation in the future was not a:made:plead correctly or sufficiently . With respect to Jane Doe Number 101, there was no such waiver. And while Mr. Epstein's counsel still believe the motion to be well-grounded, PLEASE INSERT OTHER DETAILS OF W

ocuments, we presented you with your own email that acknowledged the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See July 3, 2008 Email from Villafana to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the [work release] program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated pris

of any other claims, federal, state, or common law mandates an additional affirmative act by the plaintiff. No such waiver was filed or even pled. Jane Doe 101 did no more than restate that her complaint in civil action no 9:09-cv-80591-KAM was only for 2255 damages. She never affirmatively waived all

ge 8 own email in which you acknowledged the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See July 3, 2008 Email from Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafana to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the [work release] program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated pris

7th Floor Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 Re: B.B. I. JEFFREY EPSTEIN OUR FILE NO.: 080303 Dear Ms. As you are aware, this firm represents Plaintiff, Jane Doe, a/k/a/ B.B. in the civil litigation against Jeffrey Epstein styled Jeffiey Epstein. case no.: 502008CA037319 MB AB. We are hereby requesting that

h you had previously acknowledged that the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See Exhibit 24, July 3, 2008 Email from Assistant U.S. Attorney to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the [work release] program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated priso

Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs 5 Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. 6 THE COURT: Good morning. 7 MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane 8 Doe. 9 THE COURT: Good morning. 10 MR. GARCIA: Good morning, Your Honor. Sid Garcia for 11 Jane Doe II. 12 THE COURT: Good morning. 13 MR. WILLI

tact me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney cc: Colonel Michael Gauger Chief, Northern Division I EFTA00232797 EFTA00232798 U.S. Department ofJustice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida VIA HAND