Epstein Secrets

Mr. Josefsberg so that he can begin his representation, and provide me with a copy for my file. I have conferred with the lead AUSA in the case of Jane Doe 1 and 21 United States, EFTA00183579 JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. ROY BLACK, ESQ. AUGUST 26, 2008 PAGE 2 OF 2 and he agrees that, based upon the discu

they're not entitled to seal then I'll order it as dcGunanta unsealed. but that's kind of procedurally where I think the case So. I will allow Nz. Borger and 14. Skuilmen to argue if they wish to, otherwise I will go over to Mx. Goldberger and Mi. Critt911 to perhaps talk about whet they think about m

LNAN: Deanna Shullnan THE COURT: S-H-U-L -- KS. SHULLMAN: S-H-U-L-L-X-A-N THE COURT: Me. Shullman, good morning. Hr. Berger, good morning. And Mr. Borger, your client is E -- NR. BERGER: ., yes. THE COURT: Anybody else here? Nit. EDWARDS: Bred Edwards on behalf of as well, Judge. Thanks, EFTA0018

tered on FLSD Docket 07/15/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON IN RE: JANE DOE, Petitioner. FILED by JUL 0 9 2008 STEVEN N. LAMMORE CLERK U.S MST. CS s.o. or nA.-wra. GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO VICTIM'S EMERGENCY PETITION F

lf of The Post is? MS. SHULLMAN: Deanna Shullman. THE COURT: S-H-V-L -- MS. SHULLMAN: S-H-U-L-L-K-A-N. THE COURT: Ms. Shullman, good morning. Mr. Borger, gOOd morning. And Hr. Berger, your client is E -- HR. BERGER: E.W., yes. THE COURT: Anybody else here? MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edward■ on behalf of E.N

of The Post is? MS. RIPUIJ.MN: Deanna Shullman. THE COURT: S-H-U- I.. - MS. SHULLMAN: S-H-U-L-L-M-A-N. THE COURT: Ma. Shullman, good morning. Hr. Borger, good morning And Mr. Berger, your client is B - M. StRGE.P. L.N.. yOO THE COURT: Anybody tie. here? MR ESPORng: Brad Edwards on behalf of B.W. a

riod and say, You 25 know, I should have realized there was something that were being prosecuted on behalf of throe young 1 woman: M., B.N. and Jane Doe. And w➢ will refer to them when I talk to you about them in that ➢ame way, 4 referring to sham by those initial➢ and that 5 pseudonym. 4 Desc

on't have 25 scheme. And there wan even one or two 31 any further questions. 21 clients that More part of the Ponsi scheme. 32 MR. LINK: Mr. Borger, before we start 22 But maybe. being -- playing on 33 [roes-examination, do you want to take a 23 nocantics. I just don't consider it to be

ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for de-triages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

scheme. EFTA00223282 Epstein 1RRA, et al. Page S6 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Borger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which