Epstein Secrets

odhurst Orseck Josefsberg et al. City National Bank Building 25 W Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL33 Telephone: Fax: Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe 101 EFTA00728158 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:09-CV-80591-KAM Jane Doe 101, Plaintiff, vs. Jeffrey E

mitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court, the United States Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Second Circuit, Fourth Circuit, Fifth Circuit, Eighth Circuit, Ninth Circuit, and Eleventh Circuit, the United States District Courts for the EFTA00728154 District of Columbia,

s. To inform Jane Doe of dates that he had arranged, Evans called Jane Doe on a cellular telephone that she had acquired from him. Evans also gave Jane Doe's cellular telephone number to customers and told Jane Doe to arrange dates when customers called. During the dates, Ev- ans called Jane Doe on the

00191910 Page 1 of 3 Westlaw. 137 F.2d 71 Page I 137 F.2d 71 (Cite as: 137 F.2d 71) C SPENCE I. COLE C.A.4 1943. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. SPENCE, Chief of Police, COLE et al. No. 5082. July 14, 1943. 5. Courts 508(7) The arrest by federal courts of the processes of the criminal l

ages of a prepubescent fe- male known as Jane Doe. Images of this young girl had been found on several individuals' computers and were labeled with Jane Doe's actual name. NCMEC analysts used this information to locate the girl in Indianapolis, Indiana. Law enforcement officials interviewed Jane Doe. Sh

ion of judicial de- cisions issued on or after Jan. 1, 2007. See also Fourth Circuit Rule 32.1 (Find CTA4 Rule 32.1) United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Phillip Daniel DENKLER, a/k/a George Austin, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-4781. Submitted: March 7

there, in facts far different from those presented here, the defendant admitted using both a cellular telephone and a land-line telephone to entice Jane Doe to engage in prostitution" (emphasis added). That admission makes Evans no precedent for a prosecution here, since there is no evidence the phones

persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual to travel in interstate commerce... to engage in prostitution... shall be fined, etc."), the Fourth Circuit ed that a single telephone call invitation to a former prostitute, asking him to return to to resume her prostitution, was sufficient. -The fact