Epstein Secrets

207 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/08/2013 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN FOR PROSPECTIVE LIMITED INTERVENTION AT THE REMEDY

made by the victims to seek a remedy that would harm him," Motion to Dismiss Non-Party Interlocutory Appeal (filed by plaintiffs in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, Roy Black, et at, Intervenors, Eleventh Circuit No. 13-12923, citing Doc.108 at 13 n.3 (Mr. Epstein's assertion that he has an

ation is timely." United States v. Jefferson County, 720 F.2d 1511, 1516 (11th Cir. 1983). "'Timeliness' is not precisely measurable," Brown ex reL O'Neil v. Bush, 194 Fed. Appx. 879, 882 (11th Cir. 2006), and is "not limited to chronological considerations but is to be determined from all the circumst

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN FOR PROSPECTIVE LIMITED INTERVENTION AT THE REMEDY

made by the victims to seek a remedy that would harm him," Motion to Dismiss Non-Party Interlocutory Appeal (filed by plaintiffs in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, Roy Black, et al., Intervenors, Eleventh Circuit No. 13-12923, citing Doc.108 at 13 n.3 (Mr. Epstein's assertion that he has an

ited States v. Jefferson County, 720 F.2d 1511, 1516 (1 1 th Cir. 1983). "'Timeliness' is not precisely measurable," 2 EFTA00583796 Brown a rel. O'Neil v. Bush, 194 Fed. Appx. 879, 882 (11th Cir. 2006), and is "not limited to chronological considerations but is to be determined from all the circumst

of a federal case, but I don't recall discussing that at the time. 35 I had never before used a non-prosecution 34 As I noted in my filings in the Jane Doe' United States litigation, I had concerns about informing the victims that part of the negotiations involved securing for them the right to obtain d

ms' Rights and Restitution Act, and other pieces r victims' rights legislation, primarily from two prior cases that I had handled. In United States O'Neil, I had litigated the Office's first case where a defendant objected to a victim impact statement. It was a case where a 41-year-old man gave a leth