Epstein Secrets

. OPR is also investigating allegations stemming from the February 21, 2019 order issued by U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra, in Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2 I. United States, 9:08-80736-CIV- MARRA (S.D. Fla.), in which Judge Marra concluded that the USAO violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act, 18 U.S.C.

ilty plea, two of Epstein's victims filed suit against the United States alleging violations of the Crime Victim's Rights Act (CVRA). Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2. United States, S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CV-KAM. The CVRA requires members of the Justice Department to use their "best efforts" to confer with v

Jeffrey Epstein, known as Operation Leap Year. 2. That matter involved the issuance of subpoenas on behalf of and the presentation of testimony to Federal Grand Jury No. 07-103 (WPB), which was empaneled by U.S. District Judge EFTA00225025 Donald M. Middlebrooks on January 19, 2007.' 3. In 2007, the U.S.

ult in a disposition of the charges in the next several days." [CVRA Petition, DE 1, 13]. Claiming to be wrongfully excluded from those discussions, Jane Doe 1 asserted the violation of her CVRA rights to confer with federal prosecutors; to be treated with fairness; to receive timely notice of relevant cou

ntiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe &filed by United States of America. (Lee, Dexter) (Entered: 05/30/2011) 06/17/2011 fd Notice of Supplemental Authority ma& Plaintiffs MOTION for Sum

ry" as authority for its submission of the above documents under seal. The November 8, 2011 order refers to certain collateral evidence gathered in Federal Grand Jury Proceeding 05-02 and Federal Grand Jury Proceeding 07-103 (WPB) [DE 121-1, page 15], matters having little, if any, relevance to the issues fr

red on FLSD Docket 06/18/2013 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARFCA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, respondent. ORDER GRANTING PETITIONERS' MOTION TO PROFFER GOVERNMENT CORRESPONDENCE IN SUPPORT O

ry" as authority for its submission of the above documents under seal. The November 8, 2011 order refers to certain collateral evidence gathered in Federal Grand Jury Proceeding 05-02 and Federal Grand Jury Proceeding 07-103 (WPB) [DE 121-1, page 15], matters having little, if any, relevance to the issues fr

h County, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, F JEFFREY EPSTEIN, did intentionally harass another person, that is, Jane Doe #1, in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade Jane Doe #1 from reporting to a law enforcement officer of the United States the T commission of

another person, that is, L.G., in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade L.G. from attending or testifying in an official proceeding, that is a Federal Grand Jury appearance in the Southern District of Florida, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1512(d)(2) and 2; and Count 2 charges t

of Title 18, United States Code. Sections 1512(d)(2) and 2; and Count 2 charges that the defendant intentionally harassed another person, that is, Jane Doe #1, in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade Jane Doc #1 from reporting to a law enforcement officer of the United States the commission of a

another person, that is, L.G., in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade L.G. from attending or testifying in an official proceeding. that is a Federal Grand Jury appearance in the Southern District of Florida, in violation of Title 18, United States Code. Sections 1512(d)(2) and 2; and Count 2 charges t

tein's state guilty plea, two of Epstein's victims filed suit against the United States alleging violations of the Crime Victim's Rights Act (CVRA). Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States, S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CV-KAM. The CVRA requires members of the Justice Department to use their "best efforts

effrey Epstein, known as Operation Leap Year. 2. That matter involved the issuance of subpoenas on behalf of and the presentation of testimony to Federal Grand Jury No. 07-103 (WPB), which was empaneled by U.S. District Judge EFTA00225014 Donald M. Middlebrooks on January 19, 2007.' 3. In 2007, over my

2; and Count 2 charges that the defendant intentionally harassed another person, that is, Jane Doe #1, in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade Jane Doe #1 from reporting to a law enforcement officer of the United States the commission of a federal offense; in violation of Title 18, United States Cod

ssed another person, that is, S., in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade S. from attending or testifying in an official proceeding. that is a Federal Grand Jury appearance in the Southern District of Florida, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1512(d)(2) and 2; and Count 2 charges t

2; and Count 2 charges that the defendant intentionally harassed another person, that is, Jane Doe #1, in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade Jane Doe #1 from reporting to a law enforcement officer of the United States the commission of a federal offense; in violation of Title 18, United States Cod

another person, that is, L.G., in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade L.G. from attending or testifying in an official proceeding, that is a Federal Grand Jury appearance in the Southern District of Florida, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1512(d)(2) and 2; and Count 2 charges t

h County, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, F JEFFREY EPSTEIN, did intentionally harass another person, that is, Jane Doe #1, in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade Jane Doe #1 from reporting to a law enforcement officer of the United States the T commission of

harassed another person, that is , in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuad= from attending or testifying in an official proceeding, that is a Federal Grand Jury appearance in the Southern District of Florida, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1512(d)(2) and 2; and Count 2 charges t

efendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, b did knowingly and intentionally violate the privacy protection accot y 18 U.S.C. § 3509 to a child victim, that is, Jane Doe #1; in violation of Title 18, United Sta ode, Sections 403 and 2. COUNT 2 In or around 2005, in the special territorial jurisdiction of the Unite

ssed another person, that is, ■., in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade ■. from attending or testifying in an official proceeding, that is a Federal Grand Jury appearance in the Southern District of Florida, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1512(d)(2) and 2; and Count 2 charges t