Epstein Secrets

efamatory copycat of the first." There has been a twist in the first Jane Doe lawsuit. Her mother in Georgia contends that her former husband — Jane Doe's father — con- sulted with neither of them before filing the lawsuit. She is asking a judge to halt the litigation until her daughter turns 18 in

a matter pending in the United States Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? Yes X No 3. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) of the United States Attorney's Office prior to May 18, 2003? Yes X No 4. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Northe

OTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, L.M. in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

orthern Region of the U.S. Attorneys Office prior to October 14, 2003? _ Yes )C No 10. 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? Yes _X_ No Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office p

N, ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

the Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? — Yes X No 10. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? — Yes __X— No 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the V.S. Attorney's Of

, ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, L.M. in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) ded claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in rces s of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

the Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? _ Yes X No 10. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? _ Yes __X__ No 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's O

of prostitu- tion arising from the same alleged incidents with several girls. That case.is set for trial in July, two yearsafter he was indicted. Jane Doe's new lawsuit, filed in Palm Beach County. Circuit Court, is the most explicit in detailing Epstein's allegli ndu • the only suit to ihelude and

m a matter pending in the United States Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? Yes X No 3. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) of the United States Attorney's Office prior to May 18, 2003? Yes 21_ No 4. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the North

at the wealthy money manager had her brought to his mansion for a massage, then engaged in sexual activity with her. The girl, identified only as Jane Doe, was 14 at the time. She was the youngest of sev- eral alleged victims of Epstein. according to Palm Beach police, who spent 11 months investigati

a matter pending in the United States Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? Yes X No 3. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) of the United States Attorney's Office prior to May 18, 2003? Yes X No 4. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Norther

6, 09-80802, 09-81092, DECLARATION OF ADAM D. HOROWITZ 1. My name is Adam D. Horowitz. I am an attorney for Jane Doe No. 4. 2. The deposition of Jane Doe No. 4 was scheduled for September 16, 2009 at 1:00 p.m. at 350 Australian Ave. South, Suite 115, West Palm Beach, Florida. On the day before the de

orthern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? _ Yes X No 10. 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending In the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? — Yes _X— No Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office p

ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for de-triages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

he Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? — Yes X._ No 10. Does this case originate from a matter pending In the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? Yes _X— No 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office