Epstein Secrets

tiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe & MOTION Motion to Supplement Authorities re 50 Plaintiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Of

11446 MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe & MOTION Motion to Supplement Authorities re 50 Plaintiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's O

13) NOTICE by United States of America of Filing Declaration of OPR Counsel Ro in . A h on (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B - Declaration of OPR Counsel Robin C. Ashton) ) (Entered: 10/18/2013) REPLY to Response to Motion re 226 Renewed MOTION for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevan

orney's Office for violating Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's rights; • A monetary sanction imposed against the U.S. Attorney's Office, to be paid to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 directly or to any other appropriate person or entity;; • An order establishing the precise rule regarding the timing of the obli

ld have been addressed in the course of litigation, unless a court has made a specific finding of misconduct by a DOJ attorney . . . ." Letter from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, May 6, 2001, attached as Exhibit 1 to Victim's Mot. File Supp. Auth. DE #82. Accordingly, an order by this Court makin

orney's Office for violating Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's rights; • A monetary sanction imposed against the U.S. Attorney's Office, to be paid to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 directly or to any other appropriate person or entity;; • An order establishing the precise rule regarding the timing of the obli

ld have been addressed in the course of litigation, unless a court has made a specific finding of misconduct by a DOJ attorney . . . ." Letter from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, May 6, 2001, attached as Exhibit 1 to Victim's Mot. File Supp. Auth. DE #82. Accordingly, an order by this Court makin

given to attorneys for the victims about the non-prosecution agreement, including information about what could be told to Brad Edwards (counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2) about the non-prosecution agreement; 0 All correspondence, documents, and other information regarding Epstein's awareness that

with regard to Suppl. Box #3 P-013940 to P-013942. The description there reads: "Draft Letter marked 'Confidential: To Be Opened by Addressee Only,' Robin C. Ashton to with handwritten corrections." No date is provided regarding this letter. Nor is there any indication as to whether the letter was or was not ci

FLSD Docket 10/28/2013 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF RENEWED MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WI

tantive information that was "collected" during the OPR investigation. Where in the log is the information that was collected? The declaration from Robin C. Ashton, Counsel of OPR, only deepens the mysteries swirling around the Government's privilege log. For example, Ashton asserts "deliberative process" priv

given to attorneys for the victims about the non-prosecution agreement, including information about what could be told to Brad Edwards (counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2) about the non-prosecution agreement; f) All correspondence, documents, and other information regarding Epstein's awareness that

ith regard to Suppl. Box #3 P-013940 to P-013942. The description there reads: "Draft Letter, marked `Confidential: To Be Opened by Addressee Only,' Robin C. Ashton to Wifredo A. Ferrer, with handwritten corrections." No date is provided regarding this letter. Nor is there any indication as to whether the lette

RESDabekefiDNISEPajngt a ei4 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE No. I and JANE DOE No. 2 v. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 1. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereb

h regard to Suppl. Box #3 P-013940 to P-013942. The description there reads: "Draft Leteri_ marked `Confidential: To Be Opened by Addressee Only,' Robin C. Ashton to Wifredo A. =, with handwritten corrections." No date is provided regarding this letter. Nor is there any indication as to whether the letter wa

given to attorneys for the victims about the non-prosecution agreement, including information about what could be told to Brad Edwards (counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2) about the non-prosecution agreement; f) All correspondence, documents, and other information regarding Epstein's awareness that

ith regard to Suppl. Box #3 P-013940 to P-013942. The description there reads: "Draft Letter, marked 'Confidential: To Be Opened by Addressee Only,' Robin C. Ashton to Wifredo A. Ferrer, with handwritten corrections." No date is provided regarding this letter. Nor is there any indication as to whether the lette

16 move ore tenus to add the victim that's in the 17 courtroom to this conference with the U.S. 18 Attorney's Office. 19 THE COURT: So is that Jane Doe 2 for 20 purposes of this? 21 MR. EDWARDS: Exactly, Your Honor. 22 THE COURT: All right. Let me hear from the 23 government then. 24 MR. LEE:

with regard to Suppl. Box #3 P-013940 to P-013942. The description there reads: "Draft Letter marked `Confidential: To Be Opened by Addressee Only,' Robin C. Ashton to Wifredo A. = with handwritten corrections." No date is provided regarding this letter. Nor is there any indication as to whether the letter was