Epstein Secrets

DIVISION www.fisb.uscourts.gov IN RE: CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., CHAPTER 11 Debtor. INTERVENORS L.M., E.W.. AND JANE DOE'S LIST OF REOUESTED RELIEF SOUGHT IN THIS CASE Intervenors L.M., E.W., and "Jane Doe" (hereinafter "the Victims"), proceeding pseudonymously, having

phone: (954) 315-1157 By: Is/ Peter E. Shapiro Peter E. Shapiro (FBN 615551) pshapiro @shapirolawpa.com Attorneys for Intervenors L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe 4 EFTA00808135 Case 09-34791-R BR Doc 6384 Filed 05/14/18 Page 5 of 6 SERVICE LIST Bradley J. Edwards FLBN 542075 Brittany N. Henderson FLBN 1

ned in violation of an order from U.S. I EFTA00808132 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6384 Filed 05/14/18 Page 2 of 6 Bankruptcy Judge Raymond B. Ray of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. See DE 1194, In Re: Rothstein Rosenfeld: Adler, P.A., No. 09-34791-RBR. If you are in possession of any of t

tline Response in Opposition 04/03/18 PVD [No Charge] Work on hearing binder re Farmer l e 's Motion to Show Cause, Edwards' Joinder, , E.W. and Jane Doe's Joinder and Motion to ervene 04/03/18 PVD [No Charge] Work on exhibit of comparison of privilege log for in camera inspection; work on Exhibit A

Camera Review; work on Exhibit A to same which compares 47 e-mails (proposed trial exhibit privilege log entries; work on Response to ., E.W. and Jane Doe's Joinder in bankruptcy Motion to Show Cause; work on Response to Farmer Jaffe's Motion to Show Cause; work on proposed Order Sealing disc and exh

Writ of Certiorari; work on Response to B. Edwards' Motion to Permit to Take the Limited Deposition of J. Epstein; review Farmer Jaffe's Motion in the Bankruptcy Court and the Bankruptcy Court hearing transcript for cites to reference in same Hours May 7, 2018 Page 10 Amount 6.20 4,650.00 0.10 0.00 3.90

ff/Comter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Paul Cassell 383 S. University Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for M, E.W. and Jane Doe Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for M, E.W. and Jane Doe 14

ng, Edwards, himself, would be in violation of the Court's ruling by his reference to the e-mails in filings in this Court, the Appellate Court and the Bankruptcy Court. In fact, Epstein has taken numerous affirmative steps to ensure compliance with the Court's directives at the March 8, 2018 hearing. The disc is se

Link & Rockenbach reviewed were quite clearly not attorney-client privileged communications between Edwards and his three tort clients (M., E.W. or Jane Doe). Most significantly, numerous e-mails it reviewed were devastating to Edwards' case and contradicted both his sworn testimony and statements his co

any argument for an in camera review or other relief with respect to the e-mails in this Court or the appellate court or from defending himself in the Bankruptcy Court." 13 EFTA00808716 B. Fourth DCA D.E. Date Document 03/14/18 Epstein's Response in Opposition to Edwards' Motion for Partial Relief from St