7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
ury and justice shall be administered without sale, denial or delay. Art. I, §21, Fla. Const.; 10A Fla. Jur. 2d, Constitutional Law, §360. 16. If Jane Doe's name is not disclosed and identified, Mr. Epstein will not be afforded his fundamental right to fairly litigate this dispute and prepare for trial.
tify that Plaintiff was paid by others for similar sexual acts she claims Mr. Epstein forced upon her or that she willingly participated in certain act(s) that would negate or lessen her damages. This goes directly to Plaintiffs damage claim. 7. Likewise, subpoenas must be issued to third-party trea
ury and justice shall be administered without sale, denial or delay. Art. I, §21, Fla. Const.; 10A Fla. Jur. 2d, Constitutional Law, §360. 15. If Jane Doe's name is not disclosed and identified, Mr. Epstein will not be afforded his fundamental right to fairly litigate this dispute and prepare for trial.
tify that Plaintiff was paid by others for similar sexual acts she claims Mr. Epstein forced upon her or that she willingly participated in certain act(s) that would negate or lessen her damages. This goes directly to Plaintiffs damage claim. 7. Likewise, subpoenas must be issued to third-party trea
a telephone used by Jane Doe #2 to make an appointment for Jane Doe #2 to travel to (6) In or around 2002, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid $400 to Jane Doe #2, who was then fifteen years' old, to (7) In or around 2002, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN asked Jane Doe #2 if she had any younger friends who woul
y precludes the initiation or continuation of a federal prosecution, following a prior state or federal prosecution based on substantially the same act(s) or transaction(s) unless three substantive prerequisites are satisfied: first, the matter must involve a substantial federal interest; second, th
there, in facts far different from those presented here, the defendant "admitted using both a cellular telephone and a land-line telephone to entice Jane Doe to engage in prostitution" (emphasis added). That admission makes Evans no precedent for a prosecution here, since there is no evidence the phones
iscretion by appropriate officers of the Department of Justice in determining whether to bring a federal prosecution based on substantially the same act(s) or transactions involved in a prior state or federal proceeding." The purpose of the policy "is to vindicate substantial federal interests through
ould ultimately result in reversible error at any trial. II. Conclusion and Prayer for Relief 22. Epstein requests the following relief: a. That JANE DOE's Motion to Proceed Anonymously be denied; b. That this Court grant Epstein's Motion and that JANE DOE be identified by her legal name in the style
tify that Plaintiff was paid by others for similar sexual acts she claims Mr. Epstein forced upon her or that she willingly participated in certain act(s) that would negate or lessen her damages. This goes directly to Plaintiff's damage claim. 7. Likewise, subpoenas must be issued to third-party tre
to Compel Response to 1st RTP and 1st Interrogs filed by . (Hill, Jack) (Entered: 04/20/2009) 04 /22%2009 63 r 313:: MOTION for Leave to File Jane Doe's No. 101's Motion For Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to
ally identified in subsection (a) of the statute. Plaintiff in her response, p. 10, agrees that she has failed to sufficiently allege the predicate act(s) required by §2255. Defendant has no objection to Plaintiff attempting to amend, but Plaintiff should be required to plead a single cause of action
PSTEIN asked Jane Doe #18 to recruit other females to travel to 358 El Brillo Way. (189) On or about March 5, 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN asked Jane Doe #19, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl, to leave when she refused to remove her shirt. 31 EFTA00225809 (174) On or about September 30, 2005
to protect persons charged with criminal conduct from the burdens associated with multiple prosecutions and punishments for substantially the same act(s) or transaction(s)." Id. To that end, Petite "establishes guidelines for the exercise of discretion by appropriate officers of the Department of Jus
Entities connected to both Jane Doe and act(s

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATIONMaria Farmer
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSONMichael J. Pike
PERSONLeon Black
PERSONSouthern District
LOCATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONJack Scarola
PERSON