Epstein Secrets

9:08-cv-80381-KAM Document 77 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2009 Page 9 of 9 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldber .r Robert D Critton. Esa. /s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein -9- EFTA00201254 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 64-3 Enter

t is therefore difficult to understand how this can be grounds for a stay. Defendant does nothing more than speculate on the intentions of the USAO. The Motion to Stay is therefore, at best, premature. D. Plaintiffs Would Be Prejudiced by a Stay ° The cases discussing the stay issues are premised on a pending cr

9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 82 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2009 Page 9 of 9 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger. Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein - 9 - EFTA

t is therefore difficult to understand how this can be grounds for a stay. Defendant does nothing more than speculate on the intentions of the USAO. The Motion to Stay is therefore, at best, premature. D. Plaintiffs Would Be Prejudiced by a Stay 'The cases discussing the stay issues are premised on a pending cri

procedure that allows you to go to the district court where the grand jury is case it would be in the of Florida before Judge convened, in this Southern District Marra and that is under Rule 6E, your Honor, I think it's 6E SUSAN WIGGINS, R.P.R. AND OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER EFTA00180861 19 1 3E actually.

endun? thereto. The. Court notes the parties were present and represented by counsel. Based upor) argument, it is . ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that 1. The Motion to Stay is denied. 2. The Clerk of Court shall make the documents available for disclosure at noon on Thursday, July 2, 2009. It is the intent of the Cour