Epstein Secrets

Docket 02/23/2015 Page 25 of 25 SERVICE LIST Jane Does I and 2 United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the

There is no history of "any private prosecution of federal crimes." Young'. United States ex rel. Vuitton et Rs S.A., 481 U.S. 787, 816 n.2 (1987) (Scalia, J., concurring). While victims clearly have an interest in the outcome of criminal litigation that deserves recognition, the Framers determined tha

U.S. App. LEXIS 19807, n; 35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1352 PRIOR HISTORY: rag Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (McKenna, J.) denying appellants' motion for leave to amend their complaint to add additional plaintiffs, the district court having foun

: Sup. Ct. N.J. DISPOSITION: Application denied. OPINION r1036] ran ORDER IN A PENDING CASE ['1037] The application for stay addressed to Justice Scalia and referred to the Court is denied. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. MICHAEL WHALEN; RICHARD KAH

he manner specified by CM/ECF on this _EL day of Mav, 2009 11 EFTA00175219 CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Page 1 of 7 AEV U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Doe No. 102 v. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Lead case: 9:0

were possessed; the Court held the legislative amendment was a mere clarification of the prior legislation and not an ex post facto law. 9 Justice Scalia cited the statement of purpose of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, to hold that, for example, the amendments specifically designed to overrule Patterso