Epstein Secrets

fender registration. THE COURT: Okay. Agreed. MR. EDWARDS: So at the time -- THE COURT: So? MR. EDWARDS: So at the time she issues her statement SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00592418 51 H3ulgiva in 2015, which is, all of these allegations that deal with 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1

ff BY: BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00592369 H3ulgiva (Case called) THE COURT: We have a problem, folks. By my count 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

22 23 24 25 problem. Well, no, it isn't. No, it isn't. Okay. So let's do 675. MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I will say that it is my reading of Rule 412 that any hearing that is based upon in part Rule 412 is supposed to be conducted in a in camera setting. MS. SCHULTZ: Counsel for Ms. has no objec

9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 08)1412009 Page 9 of 9 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldber er Es . Robert D. Critton, Es . Bradley James Edwards Isidro Manuel Garcia Jack Patrick Hill Katherine Warthen Eze

9-KAM Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2009 Page 7 of 9 history, thereby evading the limitations on discovery and admissibility found in Rule 412 for the only conceivable purpose of harassing the Plaintiff. Defendant asserts that he seeks to use investigators to ask ex-boyfriends and friends

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 351 Filed 10/15/21 Page 1 of 4 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 10/15/21 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District

)(2). EFTA00065523 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 351 Filed 10/15/21 Page 3 of 4 Page 3 "Given that the hearing provides an opportunity for the Rule 412 movant to detail the evidence he seeks to admit and for the parties to discuss the propriety of its admission, the notice requirement should be see

9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 93 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 9 of 9 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Adam D. Horowitz -9- EFTA00222170

urt "must impose certain restriction on discovery to preclude inquiry into areas which will clearly fail to satisfy the balancing test" set forth in Rule 412. See Barta I. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. at 135. In Barta, the Court confronted this issue in the context of a discovery motion in a c

e pages they're now 24 talking about, Dershowitz is asked a question by -- not 25 Mr. Edwards, who's the defendant in that case, your Honor, and SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00794467 (212) 805-0300 EFTA00794468 52 H3ulgiva 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2

same 2 problem. Well, no, it isn't. No, it isn't. 3 Okay. So let's do 675. 4 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I will say that it is my 5 reading of Rule 412 that any hearing that is based upon in part 6 Rule 412 is supposed to be conducted in a in camera setting. 7 MS. SCHULTZ: Counsel for Ms. has no