Epstein Secrets

ice. Plaintiffs were either mostly illiterate or with little education and had no knowledge of their legal rights. The United States Federal Court- Southern District of New York at all times relevant to the cause(s) of action that has accrued herein. 4. Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S ESTATES , DEUTSCHE BANK, JPMO

the Defendants, both prior to and/or subsequent to the misconduct committed herein. Defendant(s) willful, wanton, gross negligent and /or negligent act(s) of commission and/or omission, resulted directly and /or proximately in the damages set forth for years. Defendant(s) : a. provided improper or

ice. Plaintiffs were either mostly illiterate or with little education and had no knowledge of their legal rights. The United States Federal Court- Southern District of New York at all times relevant to the cause(s) of action that has accrued herein. 4. Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S ESTATES , DEUTSCHE BANK, JPMO

the Defendants, both prior to and/or subsequent to the misconduct committed herein. Defendant(s) willful, wanton, gross negligent and /or negligent act(s) of commission and/or omission, resulted directly and /or proximately in the damages set forth for years. Defendant(s) : a. provided improper or

he manner specified by CM/ECF on this _EL day of Mav, 2009 11 EFTA00175219 CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Page 1 of 7 AEV U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Doe No. 102 v. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Lead case: 9:0

tify that Plaintiff was paid by others for similar sexual acts she claims Mr. Epstein forced upon her or that she willingly participated in certain act(s) that would negate or lessen her damages. This goes directly to Plaintiff's damage claim. 7. Likewise, subpoenas must be issued to third-party tre

ax ounce or .efendant Jeffrey Epstein) EFTA00175325 CM/ECF - !Ave Database - flsd Page 1 of 16 LSS, MEDIATION, REF_DISCOV U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80811-KAM MI v. Epstein et al Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Referred to: Mag

ally identified in subsection (a) of the statute. Plaintiff in her response, p. 10, agrees that she has failed to sufficiently allege the predicate act(s) required by §2255. Defendant has no objection to Plaintiff attempting to amend, but Plaintiff should be required to plead a single cause of action

AITH February 1, 2007 BY HAND M Esq., Assistant United States Attorney Esq., Deputy Chief, Northern Region Office of the United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. and Mr. ONE FACSIMILE The followi

iscretion by appropriate officers of the Department of Justice in determining whether to bring a federal prosecution based on substantially the same act(s) or transactions involved in a prior state or federal proceeding." The purpose of the policy "is to vindicate substantial federal interests through