Epstein Secrets

red on FLSD Docket 11/11/2010 Page 16 of 16 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119•MARRA/JOHNSON SERVICE LIST M.J. v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Lill Ann Sanchez Christo her E. Kni ht Helaine S. Goodner FOWLER WHITE BURNEMA Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein 16 EFTA007224

legal counsel filed a motion to "quash" service of process, alleging that process was not properly made. Attached to the Motion was an Affidavit of Richard Barnett, which swore that an "unmarked and unpostmarked envelope was discovered in the mailbox at Mr. Epstein's vacation home in New York at 9 East 7111 St

nothing short of an intentional fraud being committed on the court. The circumstances surrounding the making of this statement strongly suggest that Barnett swore to this false statement deliberately, for the purpose of obstructing proper proceedings in this case. Defendant Epstein's history of obstruct

not state who made the discovery. The affidavit does not state whether Bamett has personal knowledge of the facts contained in his affidavit. 13. Barnett subsequently filed a second affidavit, this time to merely announce that nobody named "Mark` was at the house on October 8, 2010. While this may be

No. 607363 -13- EFTA00725488 Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD SERVICE LIST M.J. v. Epstein Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards Fistos & Lehrman, PL Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Plaintiff M.J. Served

testify. The Court should also deny Plaintiff's motion for Rule 11 sanctions based upon the submission of an allegedly fraudulent affidavit by Mr. Barnett. Plaintiff has not offered any probative evidence of fraud, relying solely on caustic rhetoric. Moreover, Plaintiff has violated the mandatory saf

tant case solely to harass the Defendant and create a tempest in a teapot? Conduct involving two witnesses in prior litigation, neither of whom is Richard Bamett, is patently irrelevant to the narrow, threshold issue of whether substitute service was properly made in the instant case, and should 2Plaintiff's

United States District Court Southern District of New York Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT Pursuant to this Court's individual

South Africa 4. Philip Barden (live) Devonshires Solicitors LLP 30 Finsbury Circus London, United Kingdom EC2M 7DT DX: 33856 Finsbury Square 5. Richard Barnett (live) 14 Oakland Ave Port Washington, NY 11050 6. Custodian of Records (live) The Mar-a-Lago Club, Inc. 725 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10022 7

United States District Court Southern District of New York Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT Pursuant to this Court's individual

iles (live) 4. Philip Barden (live) Devonshires Solicitors LLP 30 Finsbury Circus London, United Kingdom EC2M 7DT DX: 33856 Finsbury Square 5. Richard Barnett (live) 6. Custodian of Records (live) The Mar-a-Lago Club, Inc. 725 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10022 7. 8. 9. Dershowitz (live) do Richard A.

ve electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. s/Lillv Ann Sanchez Lill a Ann chez SERVICE LIST MJ. v. Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards Fistos & Lehrman, PL Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Plaintiff M.J. Served

action, a Civil Rico Case Statement, a deposition subpoena, notices of video depositions, interrogatories and requests for production. (Ex. A, Aff. Richard Barnett). 3. Service was never delivered to anyone at Mr. Epstein's vacation home in New York. (Id.). 4. On or about October 13, 2010, Plaintiff's couns

EFTA00728928 Notices of Electronic Filing. s/Christopher E. Knight Christopher E. Knight SERVICE LIST v. Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 3

bject action, a Civil Rico Case Statement, a deposition subpoena, notices of video depositions, interrogatories and requests for production. (A ff. Richard Barnett). 3. Service was never delivered to anyone at Mr. Epstein's vacation home in New York. (Id.). 4. There is no return of service in the court file

dence, and detailed analysis of various phone and flight records. FBI New York investigation: • On December 6, 2018, FBI NY initiated a case after Southern District of New York (SDNY) contacted FBI NY regarding several victims that had been sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein in the mid 2000's. • Beginning in

served GJ subpoenas. Among those served included Ghislaine Maxwell, Lex Wexner, Jean Luc Brunel, William Hammond (pilot), David Rodgers (pilot), Richard Barnett (JE/GM chief engineer) • On July 8, 2019, Epstein pled not guilty during his initial appearance in federal court. • On July 11, 2019, an addition