Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access to discovery materials
k rendering that opinion in even further conflict with the well-reasoned decisions of numerous other Circuits. In particular, the Fourth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits have each adopted a per se rule favoring enforcement of a grand jury subpoena even where a protective order exists. See In re Grand Jury Subpoena,
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access to discovery materials
k rendering that opinion in even further conflict with the well-reasoned decisions of numerous other Circuits. In particular, the Fourth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits have each adopted a per se rule favoring enforcement of a grand jury subpoena even where a protective order exists. See In re Grand Jury Subpoena,
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access to discovery materials
k rendering that opinion in even further conflict with the well-reasoned decisions of numerous other Circuits. In particular, the Fourth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits have each adopted a per se rule favoring enforcement of a grand jury subpoena even where a protective order exists. See In re Grand Jury Subpoena,
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access to discovery materials
k rendering that opinion in even further conflict with the well-reasoned decisions of numerous other Circuits. In particular, the Fourth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits have each adopted a per se rule favoring enforcement of a grand jury subpoena even where a protective order exists. See In re Grand Jury Subpoena,
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (30)
Entities connected to both International Tel and Eleventh Circuits
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON9 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
MA
Martindell
PERSON9 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
David Boies
PERSON6 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
Meserve, Mumper & Hughes
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
Prince Andrew
PERSON4 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
Woody Allen
PERSON5 w/ International·3 w/ Eleventh
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
RO
Roach
PERSON4 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
Chemical Bank
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
the Protective Order
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
Southern District
LOCATION4 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
the Federal Criminal Code
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
Fourt
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
TeL Corp.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
the Government's Investigation and Application
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
JG
J. Gorenstein
PERSON4 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
BH
Branzburg v. Hayes
PERSON4 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
Orange
LOCATION4 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
Boies Schiller
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ Eleventh
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON3 w/ International·3 w/ Eleventh