Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access to discovery materials
ion had it been sought. Chemical Bank, 154 F.R.D. at 93. As that court explained: The role of the federal courts in law enforcement, exemplified by the Federal Criminal Code (Title 18, USC) and in enforcing Grand Jury subpoenas argues in favor of making significant information available to enforcement authorities absent
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access to discovery materials
ion had it been sought. Chemical Bank, 154 F.R.D. at 93. As that court explained: The role of the federal courts in law enforcement, exemplified by the Federal Criminal Code (Title 18, USC) and in enforcing Grand Jury subpoenas argues in favor of making significant information available to enforcement authorities absent
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access to discovery materials
ion had it been sought. Chemical Bank, 154 F.R.D. at 93. As that court explained: The role of the federal courts in law enforcement, exemplified by the Federal Criminal Code (Title 18, USC) and in enforcing Grand Jury subpoenas argues in favor of making significant information available to enforcement authorities absent
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access to discovery materials
ion had it been sought. Chemical Bank, 154 F.R.D. at 93. As that court explained: The role of the federal courts in law enforcement, exemplified by the Federal Criminal Code (Title 18, USC) and in enforcing Grand Jury subpoenas argues in favor of making significant information available to enforcement authorities absent
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (30)
Entities connected to both International Tel and the Federal Criminal Code
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON9 w/ International·4 w/ the
MA
Martindell
PERSON9 w/ International·4 w/ the
David Boies
PERSON6 w/ International·4 w/ the
Meserve, Mumper & Hughes
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ the
Prince Andrew
PERSON4 w/ International·4 w/ the
Woody Allen
PERSON5 w/ International·3 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ the
RO
Roach
PERSON4 w/ International·4 w/ the
Chemical Bank
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ the
the Protective Order
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ the
Southern District
LOCATION4 w/ International·4 w/ the
Fourt
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ the
TeL Corp.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ the
the Government's Investigation and Application
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ the
Eleventh Circuits
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ the
JG
J. Gorenstein
PERSON4 w/ International·4 w/ the
BH
Branzburg v. Hayes
PERSON4 w/ International·4 w/ the
Orange
LOCATION4 w/ International·4 w/ the
Boies Schiller
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·4 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON3 w/ International·3 w/ the