Back to Network
Humana Inc.
ORGANIZATIONResponse and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
ORGANIZATION3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
it works to [his] advantage [by establishing the claim] and repudiat[ing] it when it works to [his] disadvantage by requiring arbitration." In re Humana Inc. Managed Care Litigation, 285 F.3d 971, 976 (11th Cir. 2002) rev'd on other grounds by PacifiCare Health Sys.. Inc.. Book, 538 U.S. 401 (2003), citin
RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners contend the government violated their rights under the Crime Victi
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
it works to [his] advantage [by establishing the claim] and repudiat[ing] it when it works to [his] disadvantage by requiring arbitration." In re Humana Inc. Managed Care Litigation 285 F.3d 971, 976 (11th Cir. 2002) rev'd on other grounds by PacifiCare Health Sys., Inc. v. Book, 538 U.S. 401 (2003), citi
RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners contend the Government violated their rights under the Crime Victi
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
it works to [his] advantage [by establishing the claim] and repudiat[ing] it when it works to [his] disadvantage by requiring arbitration." In re Humana Inc. Managed Care Litigation 285 F.3d 971, 976 (11th Cir. 2002) rev'd on other grounds by PacifiCare Health Sys., Inc. v. Book, 538 U.S. 401 (2003), citi
RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners contend the Government violated their rights under the Crime Victi
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (99)
Entities connected to both Humana Inc. and Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
United States
LOCATION8 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON8 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
AG
Ace Greenberg
PERSON7 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
Bradley Edwards
PERSON7 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
Paul Ryan
PERSON6 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
George W. Bush
PERSON6 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
LB
Leon Black
PERSON6 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON6 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
Oliver Stone
PERSON5 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
Paul Cassell
PERSON5 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
New Hampshire
LOCATION5 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
Kenneth Marra
PERSON5 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON5 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
Alexander Acosta
PERSON5 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
John Roth
PERSON4 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
Executive
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
JE
James Eisenberg
PERSON4 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
Palm Beach Circuit Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Humana·3 w/ Response
Humana
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Humana·2 w/ Response