Epstein Secrets

sex trafficking ring to do this, just -- just right out of the blue or call somebody up on the phone. This is difficult and tricky business. The Federal Government had been trying to do this for years, and Mr. Edwards and I had been trying to do it too, so ROUGH DRAFT ONLY EFTA00607269 52 1 2 3 4 5 6

en filed ROUGH DRAFT ONLY EFTA00607234 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 in the case Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 versus the United States. This is number 2. (A Plaintiff's A Defendant's I.D. Exhibit No. 2 - A description was marked for identifi

tes" means the President, the Vice President, and any current Federal employee (including an individual appointed as an employee or detailed to the Federal Government under the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (5 U.S.C. 3371-3376)) who is detailed to or employed by any: (i) Agency (including a Government corporati

OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STAT

tes" means the President, the Vice President, and any current Federal employee (including an individual appointed as an employee or detailed to the Federal Government under the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (5 U.S.C. 3371-3376)) who is detailed to or employed by any: (i) Agency (including a Government corporati

OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-Civ-Marrailohnson JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STAT

-2009 during the exact period the targeted victim was di- rectly targeted by Epstein and Maxwell while located in Port Pine under the leader- ship of Federal Government member Rowan Ramsay Directly connected to the mother ynthia nothe. on her birthday via a mobil e)etr eCL DI Australian Federal Government - Kad

ane Does v. United States (2014) GGKJFt Warr if.) 2cc.), A December 30, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe i (1 and gel 0 Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the U.S. Department of Justice's NPA with Epstein and his limited 2008

criticize anyone who got in his way, including the elected State Attorney. This resulted in a federal investigation on a topic no one remembers the Federal Government ever being interested in prosecuting before. Although I am certain that you personally have not had your decision-making process compromised, the ap

. The Court further finds that the United States has shown that: (1) the materials are needed to avoid an injustice in another proceeding, that is, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States, S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736- Civ-Marra; (2) the need for disclosure is greater than the need for continued secrecy;

criticize anyone who got in his way, including the elected State Attorney. This resulted in a federal investigation on a topic no one remembers the Federal Government ever being interested in prosecuting before. Although 1 am certain that you personally have not had your decision-making process compromised, the ap

ROWITZ: Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane Doe. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. : Good morning, Your Honor. Sid for Jane Doe II. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. WILLITS: Good morning, Your Honor

criticize anyone who got in his way, including the elected State Attorney. This resulted in a federal investigation on a topic no one remembers the Federal Government ever being interested in prosecuting before. Although I am certain that you personally have not had your decision-making process compromised, the ap

se he's an awesome guy and he didn't do nothing wrong, nothing." 6. Other than these events, neither I nor any other FBI agent had any contact with Jane Doe #2 during the course of the investigation. Jane Doe #2 never contacted me or my co-case agents asking for information about the investigation or ask

nal sex trafficking ring to do this, just -- just right out of the blue or call somebody up on the phone. This is difficult and tricky business. The Federal Government had been trying to do this for years, and Mr. Edwards and I had been trying to do it too, so ROUGH DRAFT ONLY HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021874 Oo O DN OO F

SIGHT_021839 Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 17 in the case Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 versus the United States. This is number 2. (4 Plaintiff's * Defendant's I.D. Exhibit No. 2 - “ description was marked for identifica

ates" means the President, the Via President, and any current Federal employee (including an individual appointed as an employee or detailed to the Federal Government under the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (5 U.S.C. 3371-3376)) who is detailed to or employed by any: (i) Agency (including a Government corporati

KAM Document 79-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2011 Page 2 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-Civ- JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. BRUCE E. REINHART, Intervenor INTERVENOR'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Comes

ates" means the President, the Via President, and any current Federal employee (including an individual appointed as an employee or detailed to the Federal Government under the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (5 U.S.C. 3371-3376)) who is detailed to or employed by any: (i) Agency (including a Government corporati

FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 1 of 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO JANE DOE NI AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF TH