Epstein Secrets

. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. ~It Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 3 Attorneys for Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF Roy E. Black BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF Attorneys for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein 32 EFTA00211749

t party in a previous proceeding.' Judicial estoppel is an equitable concept intended to prevent the perversion of the judicial process." Burnes 1. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc., 291 F.3d 1282, 1285 (11th Cir. 2002) (citation omitted). Judicial estoppel prohibits "parties from deliberately changing positions according to th

CVRA action and the related civil suits. There is no concealment or unfairness that are the hallmarks for applying judicial estoppel. Cf. Burnes v. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc., 291 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2002) (applying doctrine in circumstances showing deliberate concealment of assets). Instead of presenting evidence (such

r Drive, S.W. Atlanta, GA 30303 (404) 581-6000 Jill.Steinberg®uisdoj.gov [email protected] Attorneys for the Government Roy Eric Black Jacqueline Perczek Black Srebnick Komspan & Stumpf 201 S Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 305-371-6421 Fax: 358-2006 Email: pleading®royblack.com A

CVRA action and the related civil suits. There is no concealment or unfairness that are the hallmarks for applying judicial estoppel. Cf. Burnes v. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc., 291 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2002) (applying doctrine in circumstances showing deliberate concealment of assets). Instead of presenting evidence (such

rd using the Court's CM/ECF system: U.S. Attorneys' Office for the Northern District of Georgia Maa Attorneys for the Government Roy Eric Black Jacqueline Perczek Black Srebnick Koms an & Stumpf 67 EFTA00022615