Epstein Secrets

ment is dated as of January 1, 2004, but makes some reference to Highbridge sale, so we believe and Davis Polk confirms it was signed later (though Davis Polk could or would not say when). Advisory Agreement contains provisions similar to those provided in August 1, 2003 1 EFTA00722296 employment/trans

on the incentive fee portion of the fee). Agreement is dated as of January 1, 2004, but makes some reference to Highbridge sale, so we believe and Davis Polk confirms it was signed later (though Davis Polk could or would not say when). Advisory Agreement contains provisions similar to those provided in A

, HCM is to be allocated 46% of the Incentive Fees and Management Fees collected by Highbridge Zwirn Partners, LLC (which later changed its name to D.B. Zwirn Partners, LLC - the General Partner of the Fund), D.B. Zwirn & Co., L.P. (the Fund's Trading Manager) and DB Zwirn GP, LLC (the General Partner of

this on the advice of -- 19 A. When you say "outside counsel," my 20 outside counsel? 02:18:14 21 Q. Yes, your outside counsel? 22 A. Not Davis Polk or anybody else who was 23 I think somebody else. The answer is no. 24 Q. Let's start with your outside counsel. 25 A. I don't think so. 02:

said, Based on advice of counsel. 11:51:35 16 I said -- which gave me more pause 17 because I said, Whose counsel? He said, Harry 18 Davis of Davis Polk. I said, Are they the fund's 19 counsel, the CFO's counsel, or your personal 20 counsel, now that I had my antenna up that there 11:51:53 21 w

Fund from 9 Financial Trust Company to JEEPERS? 10 A. Yes, sir. 02:16:54 11 Q. What was the purpose of that, sir? 12 A. I -- it was to -- D.B. Zwirn had a New 13 York-sourced income that was -- showing New 14 York-sourced income. As my business is a Virgin 15 Islands entity, I wanted to be e

n that Zwirn had previously refused to give you an accounting even though you are a partner. Is this still true? At the January 22, 2009 meeting at Davis Polk, Kirkland tells me that they were provided only sketchy information as to a breakdown of the direct or indirect interests in the Funds' general par

hbridge, who employed Dan Zwirn as a manager. I also invested an additional $20 MM at the beginning of 2005. • In March 2004, Zwirn spun off into D.B. Zwirn and Co. • In September 2004, Highbridge sold most of its interests to J.P. Morgan. However, it is Kirkland's understanding that, in substance, DSA

tion that Zwirn had previously refused to give you an accounting, though you are a partner. Is this still true. At the January 22, 2009 meeting at Davis Polk, we were provided only sketchy information as to a breakdown of the direct or indirect interests in the Funds' general partner and manager after Ma

hbridge, who employed Dan Zwirn as a manager. I also invested an additional $20 MM at the beginning of 2005. • In March 2004, Zwirn spun off into D.B. Zwirn and Co. • In September 2004, Highbridge sold most of its interests to J.P. Morgan. Though its is Kirklands' understanding that, in substance, Dubi

tion that Zwirn had previously refused to give you an accounting, though you are a partner. Is this still true. At the January 22, 2009 meeting at Davis Polk, we were provided only sketchy information as to a breakdown of the direct or indirect interests in the Funds' general partner and manager after Ma

hbridge, who employed Dan Zwirn as a manager. I also invested an additional $20 MM at the beginning of 2005. • In March 2004, Zwirn spun off into D.B. Zwirn and Co. • In September 2004, Highbridge sold most of its interests to J.P. Morgan. Though its is Kirklands' understanding that, in substance, Dubi