Epstein Secrets

complying with certain parts of the NPA. OPR Report at 95. According to the report: At the same time, at [USAO-SDFL supervisor] Lourie's request, Villafafta sent the NPA and its addendum to Lourie and Oosterbaan. Oosterbaan responded to Lourie that he was "not thrilled" about the NPA; described Epstein'

case. AUSA-1 also does not believe she ever received any such discovery materials. (Ex. 4 at 6). 66 EFTA00077698 requested the same relating to Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et al., 17 Civ. 0616 (JGK) (SN). Because of the ongoing and covert nature of the grand jury investigation, and consistent with its st

complying with certain parts of the NPA. OPR Report at 95. According to the report: At the same time, at [USAO-SDFL supervisor] Lourie's request, Villafafta sent the NPA and its addendum to Lourie and Oosterbaan. Oosterbaan responded to Lourie that he was "not thrilled" about the NPA; described Epstein'

case. AUSA-1 also does not believe she ever received any such discovery materials. (Ex. 4 at 6). 66 EFTA00039513 requested the same relating to Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et al., 17 Civ. 0616 (JGK) (SN). Because of the ongoing and covert nature of the grand jury investigation, and consistent with its st

complying with certain parts of the NPA. OPR Report at 95. According to the report: At the same time, at [USAO-SDFL supervisor] Lourie's request, Villafafta sent the NPA and its addendum to Lourie and Oosterbaan. Oosterbaan responded to Lourie that he was "not thrilled" about the NPA; described Epstein'

dge Netburn's Order On or about April 9, 2019, the Government advised Judge Netburn, who had not yet ruled on the Government's other application in Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et al., 17 Civ. 0616 (JGK) (SN), of Chief Judge McMahon's decision via a pane and sealed letter. (Def. Mot. 3, Ex. 1). Subsequently,

seek for violations of their rights in this case. The second statement may or may not be false, but may need some clarification. At page 4 of Ms. Villafafta declaration, she states that "[i]n October 2007, shortly after the agreement was signed, four victims [including C.W.] were contacted and these prov

E I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 16. 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. SERVICE LIST Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Case No.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Dexter A. Lee, Assistant U.S. Atto

176 Draft of September 2009 letter from Marie Villafalia to Roy Black regarding breach of Non Prosecution Agreement with handwritten attorney (Villafafta) notes Work Product Attorney-Client Privilege Deliberative Process Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation

FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S NOTICE OF FILING OF OBJECTIONS TO PRIVLEGE LOG COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also refe

70 Bates Range Description Privilege(s) Asserted Box #1 P-004561 Thru P-004565 Filed folder entitled "JANUSZ BANASIAK" containing attorney (Villafafta) handwritten notes of interview Work product Investigative privilege Box #1 P-004566 Thru P-004716 File folder entitled "JANUSZ BANASIAK REC

d to opposing counsel upon lift of stay by I Id' Circuit] Box #2 P-008536 Thru P-008542 Handwritten attorney notes to prepare for interview of Jane Doe #2 Work product Investigative Privilege Contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this suit Box #2 P-00

owitz and myself that any appeal to Washington would be undertaken expeditiously. On September 7, 2007,1, along withFAUSA Sloman, AUSAs McMillan and Villafafta, and FBI agents, met with you, Mr. Lefkowitz, and Ms. Sanchez. I understood that you wished to present federalism-based concerns regarding our pros

ttorney Edwards who was informed of these developments and who received both the initial and corrected victim notification letters that were sent to Jane Doe #1. 12. In accordance with the Court's instructions at the status conference of August 14, 2008 and the terms of the Protective Order entered by t

red on FLSD Docket 02/06/2015 Page 2 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE //I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. DECLARATION OF JANE DOE 3 1. The Court is familiar with me from my previous declara

he phone to Marie Villafafta, a federal prosecutor from Florida. 1 had seen her name on the official letter from the FBI, so she seemed legitimate. Villafafta seemed very interested in my case and seemed like she really wanted to do something. 42. Within a few weeks of the newspaper article being publishe