Epstein Secrets

TEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 3/12/2008 3/12/2008-3/17/2008 Emails between Marie Villafatia, Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and E.J. Yera regarding search warrant application and execution of search warrant 3/13/2008 Sigal Mandelker Lefkowitz Email - 2 pages (CEOS) 3/14/2008 Emai

Mucinska (former assistant) (return date 12/1/06) 15 11/15/2006 A. Marie Villafafia Lilly Ann Sanchez Gerald Lefcourt from New York and Lilly Ann Sanchez will be dealing with the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Jeffrey Epstein matter I 11/16/2006 Lilly Ann Sanchez A. Marie Villafatia Request for d

ct victims and finding counsel for victims WP DP Attorney-client privilege 97 3/12/2008-3/17/2008 emails between AMCV, Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and E.J. Yera regarding search warrant application and execution of search warrant WP Attorney client privilege IP Also contains information subject to priv

) Denied. (b) Denied. (c) Admitted. (d) Admitted. (e) Admitted to the extent that the reference to "Lillian Sanchez" was meant to refer to Lilly Ann Sanchez. (0 Admitted. (g) Admitted. 7. The government admits that, on about January 10, 2008, when Jane Doe # I and Jane Doe #2 were sent letters advisin

ge P-014694 thru P-014706 3/10/2008-3/12/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, Robert Senior, Myesha Braden, Krishna Patel, Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, E.J. Yera, and Karen Atkinson about Epstein attempts to contact victims and finding counsel for victims Work Product Deliberative Process Attorney-client

-013994 7/3/2007-714/2007 emails between Marie Villafafia and Andrew Lourie regarding extension of time to respond to subpoenas requested by Lilly Ann Sanchez and possible resolution of case 6(e) Work Product Investigative Privilege Deliberative Process P-013995 thru P-014010 6/12/2007-71612007 seri

ge P-014694 thru P-014706 3/10/2008-3/12/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, Robert Senior, Myesha Braden, Krishna Patel, Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, E.J. Yera, and Karen Atkinson about Epstein attempts to contact victims and finding counsel for victims Work Product Deliberative Process Attorney-client

-013994 7/3/2007-714/2007 emails between Marie Villafafia and Andrew Lourie regarding extension of time to respond to subpoenas requested by Lilly Ann Sanchez and possible resolution of case 6(e) Work Product Investigative Privilege Deliberative Process P-013995 thru P-014010 6/12/2007-716/2007 seri

investi • P-014694 thru P-014706 3/10/2 - / 008 emails be Work Product Deliberative Process Attorney-client privilege , Krishna Patel, , E.J. Yera, and about Epstein attempts to contact victims and finding c m... sel f P-014707 thru P-014711 3/12/2 8 emails betwee o and n= il , regarding

(s) Asserted Box #3 P-011923 Thru P-011966 Folder entitled "Responses to Arguments from JE Counsel" containing: II 7/13/2007 letter from Lilly Ann Sanchez to with handwritten attorney notes; • 6/25/2007 letter from Gerald Lefcourt to a Sloman, Menchal , and with handwritten attorney I I note

EIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # .3/12/2008 3/12/2008-3/17/2008 Emails between Marie Villafatia, Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and E.J. Yera regarding search warrant application and execution of search warrant 3/13/2008 Sigal Mandelker Lefkowitz Email - 2 pages (CEOS) 3/14/2008 Emai

rming them of FBI investigation 7 7/26/2006 South Florida Sun-Sentinel Article Regarding Chief Reiter's referral of case to FBI 8 8/2/2007 Lilly Ann Sanchez email to Matt Menchel with attached letter containing counter- proposal for plea to two years of 'supenised custody.' 9 8/24/2006- 10/24/2006 Entai

including my supervisor, Karen Atkinson, my co- counsel, John McMillan, Special Agents Kuyrkendall and Richards, AUSAs Lynn Kirkpatrick, Susan Roe, E.J. Yera, and DOJ Trial Attorneys Tammie Gregg and Myesha Braden. On several occasions, I drafted emails about re-assigning the case because the Office's han

ld exploitation cases was an issue of growing concern, so I was mindful that this plea mechanism that Criminal Chief Menchel had devised with Lilly Ann Sanchez would extinguish, the victims' right to restitution. That was one of the reasons why, on July 4, 2007, I wrote to Mr. Menchel that I believed the p