Epstein Secrets

ification Work Product Deliberative Process 6(e) Investigative Privilege P-014647 thru P-014649 2/28/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia and Susan Roe regarding related investigation, potential investigatory leads, and CEOS review Work Product Investigative Privilege 6(e) P-014650 thru P-0146

-013994 7/3/2007-7/4/2007 emails between Marie Villafafia and Andrew Lourie regarding extension of time to respond to subpoenas requested by Lilly Ann Sanchez and possible resolution of case 6(e) Work Product Investigative Privilege Deliberative Process P-013995 thru P-014010 6/12/2007-7/6/2007 seri

between Marie Villafafia, David Weinstein, and Bob Senior re email to the Civil Rights Chief B-116 2/28/2008 Emails between Marie Villafafia and Susan Roe regarding related investigation, potential investigatory leads, and CEOS review 2/28/2008 Email chain between Marie Villafatia, Jason Richards, an

Mucinska (former assistant) (return date 12/1/06) 15 11/15/2006 A. Marie Villafafia Lilly Ann Sanchez Gerald Lefcourt from New York and Lilly Ann Sanchez will be dealing with the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Jeffrey Epstein matter I 11/16/2006 Lilly Ann Sanchez A. Marie Villafatia Request for d

ification Work Product Deliberative Process 6(e) Investigative Privilege P-014647 thru P-014649 2/28/2008 emails between Marie Villafaila and Susan Roe regarding related investigation, potential investigatory leads, and CEOS review Work Product Investigative Privilege 6(e) P-014650 thru P-0146

-013994 7/3/2007-714/2007 emails between Marie Villafafia and Andrew Lourie regarding extension of time to respond to subpoenas requested by Lilly Ann Sanchez and possible resolution of case 6(e) Work Product Investigative Privilege Deliberative Process P-013995 thru P-014010 6/12/2007-71612007 seri

ification Work Product Deliberative Process 6(e) Investigative Privilege P-014647 thru P-014649 2/28/2008 emails between Marie Villafaila and Susan Roe regarding related investigation, potential investigatory leads, and CEOS review Work Product Investigative Privilege 6(e) P-014650 thru P-0146

-013994 7/3/2007-714/2007 emails between Marie Villafafia and Andrew Lourie regarding extension of time to respond to subpoenas requested by Lilly Ann Sanchez and possible resolution of case 6(e) Work Product Investigative Privilege Deliberative Process P-013995 thru P-014010 6/12/2007-716/2007 seri

garding the status of the case and the planned indictmen and the draft written notification P-014647 thru P-014649 2/28/2008 emails between and Susan Roe regarding Work Product Investigative Privilege 6(e) related investigation, potential investigatory leads, and CEOS review P-014650 thru P-0146

(s) Asserted Box #3 P-011923 Thru P-011966 Folder entitled "Responses to Arguments from JE Counsel" containing: II 7/13/2007 letter from Lilly Ann Sanchez to with handwritten attorney notes; • 6/25/2007 letter from Gerald Lefcourt to a Sloman, Menchal , and with handwritten attorney I I note

tween Marie Villafatia, David Weinstein, and Bob Senior re email to the Civil Rights Chief B I ll, 2/28/2008 Entails between Marie Villafafia and Susan Roe regarding related investigation, potential investigatory leads, and CEOS review 2/28/2008 Email chain between Marie Villafain, Jason Richards, and

rming them of FBI investigation 7 7/26/2006 South Florida Sun-Sentinel Article Regarding Chief Reiter's referral of case to FBI 8 8/2/2007 Lilly Ann Sanchez email to Matt Menchel with attached letter containing counter- proposal for plea to two years of 'supenised custody.' 9 8/24/2006- 10/24/2006 Entai

the Office, including my supervisor, Karen Atkinson, my co- counsel, John McMillan, Special Agents Kuyrkendall and Richards, AUSAs Lynn Kirkpatrick, Susan Roe, E.J. Yera, and DOJ Trial Attorneys Tammie Gregg and Myesha Braden. On several occasions, I drafted emails about re-assigning the case because the O

ld exploitation cases was an issue of growing concern, so I was mindful that this plea mechanism that Criminal Chief Menchel had devised with Lilly Ann Sanchez would extinguish, the victims' right to restitution. That was one of the reasons why, on July 4, 2007, I wrote to Mr. Menchel that I believed the p