Epstein Secrets

We have no objection to sending the letters through the mail' but we will not remove the language about contacting AUSA Villafafia or Special Agent Kuyrkendall with questions or concerns. Again, federal law requires that victims have the "reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in t

hose questions are appropriately directed to law enforcement. If questions arise related to the civil litigation, AUSA Villafafla and Special Agent Kuyrkendall will recommend that the victims direct those questions to Mr. Josefsberg. I have attached a revised letter incorporating the changes on which we can

that neutrality to create a false impression that we do not believe in the validity of the victims' claims. 2You may want to review United States'. Crompton Corp., 399 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (ND. Cal. 2005), where the district court would not allow an unindicted co-conspirator to have his name redacted from a plea

r agents. We have no objection to nili the letters through the mail F3 but we will not remove the language about contacting AUSA or Special Agent Kuyrkendall with questions or concerns. Again, federal law requires that victims have the "reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in t

statute, your statement that our notification must be limited only to the right to restitution is incorrect. You may want to review United States. Crompton Corp. , 399 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (N.D. Cal. 2005), where the district court would not allow an unindicted co-conspirator to have his name redacted from a plea

We have no objection to sending the letters through the mail n but we will not remove the language about contacting AUSA Villafaiia or Special Agent Kuyrkendall with questions or concerns. Again, federal law requires that victims have the "reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in t

statute, your statement that our notification must be limited only to the right to restitution is incorrect. nYou may want to review United States. Crompton Corp. , 399 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (N.D. Cal. 2005), where the district court would not allow an unindicted co-conspirator to have his name redacted from a plea