Epstein Secrets

a brief stay in order to seek relief in the Second Circuit. There is not a certain mechanism for doing that in an unsealing context but know that the Brown Court at the conclusion of their opinion stated their intent for that panel to maintain jurisdiction over this case for purposes of any appeals taken fro

ed in full because there are no -- there is no material within the caveat in the document. 165-3. Exhibit C. This is a copy of a motion to join in Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 files in court. That document is SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00074947 Case 20-2413, Document 10-9,07/30/2020, 2896538, P

ation in opposition. That 11 can be unsealed in full because there is no material included 12 in the caveats in the document. 13 185-2. Copy of Jane Doe's no. 3 and 4 corrected 14 joinder motion. Already filed in public. 15 185-3. Response to the motion to intervene. Already 16 filed in public. 1

a brief stay in order to seek relief in the Second Circuit. There is not a certain mechanism for doing that in an unsealing context but know that the Brown Court at the conclusion of their opinion stated their intent for that panel to maintain jurisdiction over this case for purposes of any appeals taken fro

ation in opposition. That 11 can be unsealed in full because there is no material included 12 in the caveats in the document. 13 185-2. Copy of Jane Doe's no. 3 and 4 corrected 14 joinder motion. Already filed in public. 15 185-3. Response to the motion to intervene. Already 16 filed in public. 1

ed in full because there are no -- there is no material within the caveat in the document. 165-3. Exhibit C. This is a copy of a motion to join in Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 files in court. That document is SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00075533 Case 20-2413, Document40,08/20/202

brief stay in order to seek relief in the Second Circuit. There is not a certain mechanism for doing that in an unsealing context but I know that the Brown Court at the conclusion of their opinior stated their intent for that panel to maintain jurisdiction over this case for purposes of any appeals taken fro

ed in full because there are no -- there is no material within the caveat in the document. 165-3. Exhibit C. This is a copy of a motion to join in Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 files in court. That document is SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00076449 Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2

ation in opposition. That 11 can be unsealed in full because there is no material included 12 in the caveats in the document. 13 185-2. Copy of Jane Doe's no. 3 and 4 corrected 14 joinder motion. Already filed in public. 15 185-3. Response to the motion to intervene. Already 16 filed in public. 1

July 2016. A year later and literally days before trial, the parties agreed to a settlement of the defamation claim and the case was dismissed. The Jane Doe 43 matter On January 26, 2017, plaintiff Jane Doe 43 sued various individuals including Ms. Maxwell. A Protective Order substantially similar to th

put from the various Does, the lawyers for primarily Sigrid McCawley, a partner at BSF, and counsel for Ms. Maxwell. Judge Preska was obligated by the Brown Court first to identify what was or was not a "judicial document"; second, to determine the presumption of access to the document; and third, to identify