Epstein Secrets

l would like to refer to the non-prosecution agreement in a parallel civil suit that is pending before this court. See Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 08-CW- 80893-MARRA-JOHNSON. To facilitate all these discussions, the non-prosecution agreement 09/12/2019

he first place. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown"); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (li ' Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act

nsel would like to refer to the non-prosecution agreement in a parallel civil suit that is pending before this court, See Jane Doe Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 08-C111- 80893-AtiRRii-JOHNSON. To facilitate all these discussions, the non-prosecution agreement 5 EFTA0

he first place, See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown"); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act

l would like to refer to the non-prosecution agreement in a parallel civil suit that is pending before this court. See Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 08-CIV- 80893-MARILWOFINSON. To €acilitate all these discussions, the non-prosecution agreement 5 EFTA0023

he first place. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown'); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act