Epstein Secrets

ot be subject to production. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at the above-referenced number. Enclosure See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See. e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441

ons, do not hesitate to contact me at the above-referenced number. Enclosure See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See. e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Requ

iates, representatives, agents, auditors, or counsel and (b) employees of the Department (or any other government agency). 2 3 See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S.

sel and (b) employees of the Department (or any other government agency). 2 3 See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Request

ephone the undersigned rather than rely upon the United States mail for such notice. If the Department is not satisfied that the See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441

ited States mail for such notice. If the Department is not satisfied that the See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Requ

tial Material; or (2) refer to any conference, meeting, telephone conversation, or interview between (a) our client's current or See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441

ing, telephone conversation, or interview between (a) our client's current or See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Theatawat Requ