Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
p. 2d 1214, 1216 (S.D. Fla. 2011) (citing Sierra Equity Group, Inc. v. White Oak Equity Partners, LLC, 650 F. Supp. 2d 1213, 1231 (S.D. Fla. 2009); Eisenberg v. Standard Ins. Co., No. 09- 80199, 2009 WL 1809994, at *3 (S.D. Fla. June 25, 2009)). Additionally, declaratory judgment is inappropriate to adjud
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
p. 2d 1214, 1216 (S.D. Fla. 2011) (citing Sierra Equity Group, Inc. v. White Oak Equity Partners, LLC, 650 F. Supp. 2d 1213, 1231 (S.D. Fla. 2009); Eisenberg v. Standard Ins. Co., No. 09- 80199, 2009 WL 1809994, at *3 (S.D. Fla. June 25, 2009)). Additionally, declaratory judgment is inappropriate to adjud
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
p. 2d 1214, 1216 (S.D. Fla. 2011) (citing Sierra Equity Group, Inc. v. White Oak Equity Partners, LLC, 650 F. Supp. 2d 1213, 1231 (S.D. Fla. 2009); Eisenberg v. Standard Ins. Co., No. 09- 80199, 2009 WL 1809994, at *3 (S.D. Fla. June 25, 2009)). Additionally, declaratory judgment is inappropriate to adjud
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (158)
Entities connected to both James Eisenberg and v. Lir Joe Records
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON100 w/ James·3 w/ v.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON75 w/ James·3 w/ v.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON73 w/ James·3 w/ v.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON72 w/ James·3 w/ v.
United States
LOCATION66 w/ James·3 w/ v.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON62 w/ James·3 w/ v.
George W. Bush
PERSON57 w/ James·3 w/ v.
the Southern District
LOCATION53 w/ James·3 w/ v.
Paul Cassell
PERSON37 w/ James·3 w/ v.
West Palm Beach
LOCATION28 w/ James·3 w/ v.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON24 w/ James·3 w/ v.
Michael Douglas
PERSON23 w/ James·3 w/ v.
Douglas Oil Co.
ORGANIZATION21 w/ James·3 w/ v.
RU
Rubin
PERSON20 w/ James·3 w/ v.
FISTOS & LEHRMAN
ORGANIZATION19 w/ James·3 w/ v.
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON18 w/ James·3 w/ v.
Joe Biden
PERSON18 w/ James·3 w/ v.
S.J. Quinney College of Law
ORGANIZATION18 w/ James·3 w/ v.
the University of Utah
ORGANIZATION18 w/ James·2 w/ v.
Marc Rich
PERSON14 w/ James·3 w/ v.