James Eisenberg
PERSONUndisputed Material Facts in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
ORGANIZATION3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
6 / 3
Mentions
guy and he didn't do nothing wrong, nothing. Id. at 58. 16. Several months after the videotaped interview of April 24, 2007, AUSA asked attorney Eisenberg whether she could contact Jane Doe No. 2 directly and was told that any contact with Jane Doe No. 2 had to occur via Mr. Eisenberg. Ex. S, ¶ 14. 17
awsuits against Jeffrey Epstein. 13. During the course of the federal criminal investigation of Epstein, Jane Doe No. 2 was represented by attorney James Eisenberg, Esq., whose services were paid for by Epstein. Ex. S, ¶ 7. 14. Through her attorney, Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S.
IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: 1. The Honorable Alberto Gonzales was sworn in on February 3, 2005, as Attorney General of the United States. 2. As Attorney General
wsuits against Jeffrey Epstein. 13. During the course of the federal criminal investigation of Epstein, Jane Doe No. 2 was represented by attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., whose services were paid for by Epstein. Ex. S, I 7. 14. Through her attorney, Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S.
guy and he didn't do nothing wrong, nothing. Id. at 58. 16. Several months after the videotaped interview of April 24, 2007, AUSA asked attorney Eisenberg whether she could contact Jane Doe No. 2 directly and was told that any contact with Jane Doe No. 2 had to occur via Mr. Eisenberg. Ex. S, ¶ 14. 17
IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: 1. The Honorable Alberto Gonzales was sworn in on February 3, 2005, as Attorney General of the United States. 2. As Attorney General
didn't do nothing wrong, nothing. Id. at 58. 16. Several months after the videotaped interview of April 24, 2007, AUSA Villafafia asked attorney Eisenberg whether she could contact Jane Doe No. 2 directly and was told that any contact with Jane Doe No. 2 had to occur via Mr. Eisenberg. Ex. S, 114. 17.
awsuits against Jeffrey Epstein. 13. During the course of the federal criminal investigation of Epstein, Jane Doe No. 2 was represented by attorney James Eisenberg, Esq., whose services were paid for by Epstein. Ex. S, 1 7. 14. Through her attorney, Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S.
IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. The Honorable Alberto Gonzales was sworn in on February 3, 2005, as Attorney General of the United States. 2. As Attorney General
Entities connected to both James Eisenberg and Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATIONLeon Black
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Ken Starr
PERSON
John Roth
PERSON
Alberto Gonzales
PERSONthe District of Columbia
LOCATIONAce Greenberg
PERSONthe Criminal Division of the DOJ
ORGANIZATIONG, K
ORGANIZATIONJacqueline Perczek
PERSON
Jason Richards
PERSONBENJAMIN G. GREENBERG
PERSON