Epstein Secrets

orney Edwards' other client, M., was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with M. was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation? 5. • In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Offic

she would have had, if Mr. Epstein 'The undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representing ■. or whether ■. ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. -3- EFTA00176958 had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph,

Should you decide to file a claim against Jeffrey Epstein, his attorney, Jack Goldberger, asks that you have your attorney contact Mr. Goldberger at Atterbury and Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, Please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Fe

the investigation, AUSAInauld the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist had contact with C.W. ¶ 4. Earlier in the investigation, T.M. was represented by James Eisenberg, E:sq. Consequently, all contact with T.M. was made through Mr. Eisenberg. In mid-2007, Epstein's attorneys approached the U.S. Attorney's Office in

ith C.W. ¶ 4. Earlier in the investigation, T.M. was represented by James Eisenberg, E:sq. Consequently, all contact with T.M. was made through Mr. Eisenberg. In mid-2007, Epstein's attorneys approached the U.S. Attorney's Office in an effort to resolve the federal investigation. a,j 5. At that time, Mr.

5:18 6:6 allow 5:3 9:8 13:6 allowed 12:23 amendment 4:15 and/or 14:3 announce 3:9 answer arises 10:8 articulate 15:2 assuming 15:12 Atterbury 2:3 Australian 2:3 authorized 16:4 Ave 4:9 5:4,7,8 8:23,24 9:4 9:7,10,13 9:23 10:1,4 10:6,21 11:5 12:17 12:19,21,25 13:14 15:18 beyond

(1st Cir. 1989). Only those communications made in the course of an ongoing common enterprise and intended to further the enterprise are protected. Eisenberg v. Gagnon, 766 F.2d 770, 787 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 946, 106 S. Ct. 342, 88 L. Ed. 2d 290 (1985); Matter of Bevil!, Bresier & Schulman A

Scarola, Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; and Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices of Marc S. N