Epstein Secrets

whom had not yet been notified. I have enclosed herewith that correspondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part,

son Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300 Re: Stuart Samuel Mermelstein/ ear rvis. Thank you for permitting me to respond to the letters submitted to The Florida Bar by Attorney Stuart S. Mermelstein. From the documents that you provided to me, it appears that Mr. Mermelstein faxed letters to two individuals at

whom had not yet been notified. I have enclosed herewith that correspondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part,

sistance Program The Florida Bar Re: Stuart Samuel Mermelstei Dear Ms. Brewer: Thank you for permitting me to respond to the letters submitted to The Florida Bar by Attorney Stuart S. Mermelstein and thank you for extending my response deadling to November 30, 2008. From the documents that you provided to me

whom had not yet been notified. I have enclosed herewith that correspondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part,

Re: 50,532(I5C) Dear Ms. Brewer: amucl Mermelstein/ lorida Bar File No. 2009- Thank you for permitting me to respond to the letters submitted to The Florida Bar by Attorney Stuart S. Mermelstein and thank you for extending my response deadline to November 30, 2008. From the documents that you provided to me

whom had not yet been notified. I have enclosed herewith that correspondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. F'- In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in par

uart Samuel Mermelstein/ 50,532(I5C) Dear Ms. Brewer: Florida Bar File No. 2009- Thank you for permitting me to respond to the letters submitted to The Florida Bar by Attorney Stuart S. Mermelstein and thank you for extending my response deadline to November 30, 2008. From the documents that you provided to me

hom had not yet been notified. I have enclosed herewith that correspondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part, o

tein. From the documents that you provided to me, it appears that Mr. Mermelstein faxed letters to two individuals at the Fort Lauderdale Branch of The Florida Bar. The first letter is dated September 18, 2008, and the second is dated September 24, 2008. On September 29, 2008, you wrote to Mr. Mermelstein requ

whom had not yet been notified. I have enclosed herewith that correspondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part,

assee, FL 32399-2300 Re: Florida Bar File No. 2009-50,532(15C) Dear Ms. Brewer: Thank you for permitting me to respond to the letters submitted to The Florida Bar by Attorney Stuart S. Mermelstein. From the documents that you provided to me, it appears that Mr. Mermelstein faxed letters to two individuals at