Epstein Secrets

ECF - Live Database - flsd Page 2 of 24 561-820-8711 Fax: 820-8777 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Intervenor Roy Black Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite1300 Miami, FL 33131 305-371-6421 represented by Jacqueline Perczek Black Srebnick Komspan & Stumpf J

re 49 Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts filed by United States of America. (Lee, Dexter) (Entered: 04/07/2011) 04/07/2011 59 RESPONSE in Opposition re 50 Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 an

1 42 Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts by Jane Doe. (Edwards, Bradley) (Entered: 03/21/2011) 03/21/2011 51 Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing th

1 Fax: (561) 820-8777 E-mail: Dexter.Lee0,usdoi.gov E-mail: Attorneys for the Government Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 [email protected] Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors Roy Black et al. Respectfu

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). EFTA00081155 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 41 of 64 On September 26, 2011, the Court den

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co

cument was served on October 3, 2011, on the following via US Mail and E-Mail Transmission: Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. Respectfully Submitted, S/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. EFTA00204891

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co

cument was served on October 3, 2011, on the following via US Mail and E-Mail Transmission: Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 [email protected] Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors Roy Black et al. Respectfu

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co

: [email protected] E-mail: ann marie c villafana@usdo' ov Attorneys for the Government Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 [email protected] Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors Roy Black et al. Respectfu

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co

500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attorneys for the Government Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami FL 33131 Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors Roy Black et al. Respectfully Submitted, S/ Bra

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co

500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attorneys for the Government Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors Roy Black et al. Respectfully Submitted, S/ Br

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co

going document was served on May 2, 2011, on the following using the Court's CM/ECF system: Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. ono Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Burnett PA 777 S. Hagler Drive, West Tower, Suite 901 12 EFTA00208035

o reply to the Government's Response (DE #58) to their Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE #49). The victims' proffered facts should all be accepted by the Court. The Government claims that it can prevail regardless of what the true f

cument was served on October 3, 2011, on the following via US Mail and E-Mail Transmission: Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 [email protected] Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors Roy Black et al. Respectfu

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co