Epstein Secrets

A00225045 that the state offered, including work release. Because of this, I had to withdraw the Notice of Breach and could only write I letter to the Sheriff's Office pointing out all of the false statements contained in Epstein's application for work release and letters to the victims informing them that Epstein

if he wishes." (Exhibit B-19.) Although I did not know it at the time, in preparing this response, I noticed that, in FAUSA June 3, 2008 letter to DAG Filip, he stated that the quoted language was proposed by USA Acosta "in consultation with DAAG ." (Exhibit B-123 at 7.) On December 21, 2007, attorney

had been specifically discussed with Epstein's counsel and they informed us that Epstein would not seek work release. The agents and I also met with the Sheriff's Office in advance of the plea and had been told that Epstein would not be eligible for work release. Accordingly, I provided my Notice of Breach, but was

nd jury subpoena to victim/witness, revisions to indictment, planned grand jury presentation, and plans to supersede indictment IS Ill 6/23/2008 DAG Filip completes review of Epstein's appeal 6/23/2008 6/23/2008-6/26/2008 Emails between Marie Villafaiia and grand jury witne, regarding immunity and tra

or was one of his employees who lived in New Jersey) and submitted it to the Sheriff's Office (Exhibits 83 and 84). I never received a response from the Sheriff's Office. 30 Gauger also said that Jack Goldberger had threatened that "Ken Starr and the whole crew" would sue the jail if Epstein received less favorable

shes." (Exhibit B-19.) Although I did not know it at the time, in preparing this response, I noticed that, in FAUSA Sloman's June 3, 2008 letter to DAG Filip, he stated that the quoted language was proposed by USA Acosta "in consultation with DAAG Mandelker." (Exhibit B-123 at 7.) On December 21, 2007, a