Epstein Secrets

tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis. No. 5:

tion to seal has been filed contemporaneously. EFTA00215859 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 2 of 13 The Pendine Federal Criminal Action In 2006, a Florida state grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstein on allegations similar to those in the instant actions (State of Florida v. Jeffrey Ep

tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis. No. 5:

tion to seal has been filed contemporaneously. EFTA00221964 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 2 of 13 The Pendine Federal Criminal Action In 2006, a Florida state grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstein on allegations similar to those in the instant actions (State of Florida v. Jeffrey Ep

tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis. No. 5:

tion to seal has been filed contemporaneously. EFTA00222407 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 2 of 13 The Pendine Federal Criminal Action In 2006, a Florida state grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstein on allegations similar to those in the instant actions (State of Florida v. Jeffrey Ep

tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis. No. 5:

tion to seal has been filed contemporaneously. EFTA00222710 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 2 of 13 The Pendine Federal Criminal Action In 2006, a Florida state grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstein on allegations similar to those in the instant actions (State of Florida v. Jeffrey Ep

tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis. No. 5:

tion to seal has been filed contemporaneously. EFTA01660024 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 2 of 13 The Pendine Federal Criminal Action In 2006, a Florida state grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstein on allegations similar to those in the instant actions (State of Florida v. Jeffrey Ep