Back to Network
6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
6 / 6
Mentions
Document Mentions (6 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis. No. 5:
ictims were minors at the time of the Defendants' actions alleged in both [the civil and criminal] cases, § 3509(k) applies." Id. (emphasis added). The United States Department of Justice has itself emphatically embraced the interpretation of § 3509(k) as applying to stay all civil actions relating to sex offenses against minors, pen
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis. No. 5:
ictims were minors at the time of the Defendants' actions alleged in both [the civil and criminal] cases, § 3509(k) applies." Id. (emphasis added). The United States Department of Justice has itself emphatically embraced the interpretation of § 3509(k) as applying to stay all civil actions relating to sex offenses against minors, pen
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis. No. 5:
ictims were minors at the time of the Defendants' actions alleged in both [the civil and criminal] cases, § 3509(k) applies." Id. (emphasis added). The United States Department of Justice has itself emphatically embraced the interpretation of § 3509(k) as applying to stay all civil actions relating to sex offenses against minors, pen
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis. No. 5:
ictims were minors at the time of the Defendants' actions alleged in both [the civil and criminal] cases, § 3509(k) applies." Id. (emphasis added). The United States Department of Justice has itself emphatically embraced the interpretation of § 3509(k) as applying to stay all civil actions relating to sex offenses against minors, pen
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis. No. 5:
ictims were minors at the time of the Defendants' actions alleged in both [the civil and criminal] cases, § 3509(k) applies." Id. (emphasis added). The United States Department of Justice has itself emphatically embraced the interpretation of § 3509(k) as applying to stay all civil actions relating to sex offenses against minors, pen
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe I. Francis. No. 5:
ictims were minors at the time of the Defendants' actions alleged in both [the civil and criminal] cases, § 3509(k) applies." Id. (emphasis added). The United States Department of Justice has itself emphatically embraced the interpretation of § 3509(k) as applying to stay all civil actions relating to sex offenses against minors, pen
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (162)
Entities connected to both The District Court and The United States Department of Justice
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON29 w/ The·17 w/ The
United States
LOCATION26 w/ The·8 w/ The
Julie K. Brown
PERSON22 w/ The·8 w/ The
George W. Bush
PERSON20 w/ The·8 w/ The
LB
Leon Black
PERSON17 w/ The·9 w/ The
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION16 w/ The·8 w/ The
the Southern District
LOCATION14 w/ The·10 w/ The
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON15 w/ The·7 w/ The
Alexander Acosta
PERSON14 w/ The·8 w/ The
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON15 w/ The·5 w/ The
Kenneth Marra
PERSON14 w/ The·5 w/ The
FBI
ORGANIZATION10 w/ The·9 w/ The
Michael Douglas
PERSON12 w/ The·6 w/ The
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION8 w/ The·10 w/ The
Douglas Oil Co.
ORGANIZATION11 w/ The·6 w/ The
the Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION11 w/ The·6 w/ The
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION11 w/ The·5 w/ The
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON13 w/ The·2 w/ The
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON9 w/ The·6 w/ The
Office for the Southern District of Florida
ORGANIZATION6 w/ The·9 w/ The