Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
it have applied a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access t
ent Orange" Prod. Liab. Litig., 821 F.2d 139, 147 (2d Cir. 1987)); see also Alien v. City of New York, 420 F.Supp.2d 295, 301 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (Mag. J. Gorenstein) (analyzing the differently-situated interests of civil litigants but where, as here, the relevant protective order specified that a party could ob
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
it have applied a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access t
ent Orange" Prod. Liab. Litig., 821 F.2d 139, 147 (2d Cir. 1987)); see also Allen v. City of New York, 420 F.Supp.2d 295, 301 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (Mag. J. Gorenstein) (analyzing the differently-situated interests of civil litigants but where, as here, the relevant protective order specified that a party could ob
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
it have applied a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access t
ent Orange" Prod. Liab. Litig., 821 F.2d 139, 147 (2d Cir. 1987)); see also Allen v. City of New York, 420 F.Supp.2d 295, 301 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (Mag. J. Gorenstein) (analyzing the differently-situated interests of civil litigants but where, as here, the relevant protective order specified that a party could ob
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
it have applied a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access t
ent Orange" Prod. Liab. Litig., 821 F.2d 139, 147 (2d Cir. 1987)); see also Allen v. City of New York, 420 F.Supp.2d 295, 301 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (Mag. J. Gorenstein) (analyzing the differently-situated interests of civil litigants but where, as here, the relevant protective order specified that a party could ob
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (30)
Entities connected to both Martindell and J. Gorenstein
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON52 w/ Martindell·4 w/ J.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON51 w/ Martindell·3 w/ J.
David Boies
PERSON40 w/ Martindell·4 w/ J.
SW
Sweet
PERSON27 w/ Martindell·3 w/ J.
Boies Schiller
ORGANIZATION25 w/ Martindell·4 w/ J.
Chemical Bank
ORGANIZATION19 w/ Martindell·4 w/ J.
Prince Andrew
PERSON16 w/ Martindell·4 w/ J.
SD
Subpoena Duces
PERSON15 w/ Martindell·3 w/ J.
Southern District
LOCATION11 w/ Martindell·4 w/ J.
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Martindell·4 w/ J.
BH
Branzburg v. Hayes
PERSON11 w/ Martindell·4 w/ J.
George W. Bush
PERSON11 w/ Martindell·3 w/ J.
International Tel
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Martindell·4 w/ J.
Woody Allen
PERSON9 w/ Martindell·3 w/ J.
Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Martindell·3 w/ J.
Orange
LOCATION6 w/ Martindell·4 w/ J.
Meserve, Mumper & Hughes
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Martindell·4 w/ J.
TeL Corp.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Martindell·4 w/ J.
the Government's Investigation and Application
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Martindell·4 w/ J.
the Protective Order
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Martindell·4 w/ J.