Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
it have applied a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access t
k rendering that opinion in even further conflict with the well-reasoned decisions of numerous other Circuits. In particular, the Fourth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits have each adopted a per se rule favoring enforcement of a grand jury subpoena even where a protective order exists. See In re Grand Jury Subpoena,
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
it have applied a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access t
k rendering that opinion in even further conflict with the well-reasoned decisions of numerous other Circuits. In particular, the Fourth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits have each adopted a per se rule favoring enforcement of a grand jury subpoena even where a protective order exists. See In re Grand Jury Subpoena,
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
it have applied a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access t
k rendering that opinion in even further conflict with the well-reasoned decisions of numerous other Circuits. In particular, the Fourth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits have each adopted a per se rule favoring enforcement of a grand jury subpoena even where a protective order exists. See In re Grand Jury Subpoena,
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
it have applied a balancing test to evaluate the government's ability to obtain access to materials covered by a protective order. Specifically, in Martindell v. International Tel. and TeL Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), the government informally—and without use of a grand jury subpoena—sought access t
k rendering that opinion in even further conflict with the well-reasoned decisions of numerous other Circuits. In particular, the Fourth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits have each adopted a per se rule favoring enforcement of a grand jury subpoena even where a protective order exists. See In re Grand Jury Subpoena,
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (30)
Entities connected to both Martindell and Eleventh Circuits
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON52 w/ Martindell·4 w/ Eleventh
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON51 w/ Martindell·3 w/ Eleventh
David Boies
PERSON40 w/ Martindell·4 w/ Eleventh
SW
Sweet
PERSON27 w/ Martindell·3 w/ Eleventh
Boies Schiller
ORGANIZATION25 w/ Martindell·4 w/ Eleventh
Chemical Bank
ORGANIZATION19 w/ Martindell·4 w/ Eleventh
Prince Andrew
PERSON16 w/ Martindell·4 w/ Eleventh
SD
Subpoena Duces
PERSON15 w/ Martindell·3 w/ Eleventh
Southern District
LOCATION11 w/ Martindell·4 w/ Eleventh
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Martindell·4 w/ Eleventh
BH
Branzburg v. Hayes
PERSON11 w/ Martindell·4 w/ Eleventh
George W. Bush
PERSON11 w/ Martindell·3 w/ Eleventh
International Tel
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Martindell·4 w/ Eleventh
Woody Allen
PERSON9 w/ Martindell·3 w/ Eleventh
Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Martindell·3 w/ Eleventh
Orange
LOCATION6 w/ Martindell·4 w/ Eleventh
Meserve, Mumper & Hughes
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Martindell·4 w/ Eleventh
TeL Corp.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Martindell·4 w/ Eleventh
the Government's Investigation and Application
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Martindell·4 w/ Eleventh
the Protective Order
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Martindell·4 w/ Eleventh